Murder.

It's pretty crazy that there are people that consider the killing of over 100k civilians via nuke "collateral damage."

The Japanese Empire were the aggressors and they were little better than the Nazis when it came to crimes against humanity, so f**k them. But yeah, Nagasaki and Hiroshima where atrocities.

I learned alot from reading this thread

Does the loneranger think that 9/11 was murder or collateral damage?

How about pearl harbor?

How are the two different?

Originally posted by truejedi
Does the loneranger think that 9/11 was murder or collateral damage?

How about pearl harbor?

How are the two different?

His “logic” is pretty simple really.

When Americans are the victims its terror. When they are the aggressors its legitimate military action.

Numbers of civilians killed, targeted really doesnt come into it, though he might use that argument hypocritically.