Bullseye vs Deadshot; who's the better marksman

Originally posted by h1a8
The fact that Bulleyes throws things vs. DS shoots things is irrelevant. Both don't miss (a tie) but DS has longer ranged feats.

From two miles, at a guy at full gallop on a horse, through the eye:

Against a teleporter:
https://imgur.com/a/Oyt0z

I mean, the guy does this:
https://imgur.com/cBvYqmP

But apparently, you think DS has better feats?

Than this?
https://i.imgur.com/oJovenl.jpg

You are trying to equalise things when it really isn't possible. Deadshot does not do what Bullseye does, even with bullets. This isn't about missing targets, this is about practically doing Toon force feats with household objects. Bullseye opens safes with pebbles; Deadshot does NOT open them with bullets:
https://imgur.com/zfwU0wL

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
is h1 actually serious? WTF?

You should've seen his post saying he could become Bullseye if he trained hard and long enough, lol.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
You should've seen his post saying he could become Bullseye if he trained hard and long enough, lol.

wait WHAT

😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
You should've seen his post saying he could become Bullseye if he trained hard and long enough, lol.

Yeah, I remember that one. IRL anyone that wouldn't run at the sight of comic street tier characters, would have a death wish. But yeah h1 loves to challenge the popular opinion.

Deadshot once did that thing where he didn't miss and also he has range because he uses gun(s) so he wins. Bullseye is more of a makeshift weapons guy so his aim with a more accurate weapon is worse than the guy with range.

I know a lot about both. I mentioned his range because he uses a weapon. FRESH Prince, need I say more?

Originally posted by One Big Mob
Deadshot once did that thing where he didn't miss and also he has range because he uses gun(s) so he wins. Bullseye is more of a makeshift weapons guy so his aim with a more accurate weapon is worse than the guy with range.

I know a lot about both. I mentioned his range because he uses a weapon. FRESH Prince, need I say more?

I know guys that can throw far more accurately than they can shoot.

Therefore your argument that Bullseye can shoot just as good as DS because he is accurate throwing stuff is faulty.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
You should've seen his post saying he could become Bullseye if he trained hard and long enough, lol.

Originally posted by One Big Mob
How are you going to look at Bullseye killing someone with a toothpick, factor it in and then say "But could he do it with a gun at a longer range when he has much more control and bullet ballistics that's common knowledge available to him? Thought so!" You'd be lucky to throw a toothpick within 2 feet of your target in your room with minimal air resistance or winds, let alone calculate it going hundreds of feet with a flick outside through a window at killing velocities.

I really need to never click h1's posts again 🙁

Which is at least kinda like being accurate, but with more legwork.

Originally posted by h1a8
I know guys that can throw far more accurately than they can shoot.

Therefore your argument that Bullseye can shoot just as good as DS because he is accurate throwing stuff is faulty.

Bullseye's ability is to be accurate. That includes firearms, and he has showings to back that up. You're also ignoring the difficulty of his other feats. Range isn't the only factor in something like that.

I know guys who can throw hundreds of yards more accurately than they can shoot. They only get on the paper when their gun is sighted from 300 yards but they can throw a baseball and hit the bullseye from that same distance.

I don't think h1 has ever seen a gun in real life before, or another person. If a pitcher can throw more accurate than they can shoot a sighted in gun to their eye then they've never handled a gun before.

I blame Style for the quote on this one. Why is he in a non woman vs woman thread?

I'm honestly of two minds in regards to this fight. In a straight fight, I could definitely see Floyd winning because of his body armor and the fact that he uses actual guns. On the other hand, mr tryhard with his stupid toothpick, playing cards, and paper airplanes has far better aimbot feats. I don't like using Bullseyes "marksmanship" feats because they are so far from making sense that they come off less like ungodly marksmanship and more like the writers are morons that don't have a clue how physics works; especially since Bullseyes W/L ratio is less than spotless.

Originally posted by One Big Mob
I know guys who can throw hundreds of yards more accurately than they can shoot. They only get on the paper when their gun is sighted from 300 yards but they can throw a baseball and hit the bullseye from that same distance.

I don't think h1 has ever seen a gun in real life before, or another person. If a pitcher can throw more accurate than they can shoot a sighted in gun to their eye then they've never handled a gun before.

I blame Style for the quote on this one. Why is he in a non woman vs woman thread?

Originally posted by deathslash
I'm honestly of two minds in regards to this fight. In a straight fight, I could definitely see Floyd winning because of his body armor and the fact that he uses actual guns. On the other hand, mr tryhard with his stupid toothpick, playing cards, and paper airplanes has far better aimbot feats. I don't like using Bullseyes "marksmanship" feats because they are so far from making sense that they come off less like ungodly marksmanship and more like the writers are morons that don't have a clue how physics works; especially since Bullseyes W/L ratio is less than spotless.

Originally posted by StyleTime

It's not a fight though. It's who is the better marksman.

Lol at ha1 continuing his BS after DS posted the two mile shot feat.

Like I said Floyd has a few feats at the same level like Koing Enchantress with a shot that creased her brow from a distance that Colonel Flag needed binoculars just to make out which one Enchantress was.

Lester has a lot more feats on that level consistently

Rochochet Rabbit out shoots/aims them both

At the time the feat occurred in comics, I think the WR for a sniper was 1.5 miles. Now it's 2, but they had spotters etc.

And the target wasn't (AFAIK) on full gallop on a horse, lol.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
From two miles, at a guy at full gallop on a horse, through the eye:

Against a teleporter:
https://imgur.com/a/Oyt0z

I mean, the guy does this:
https://imgur.com/cBvYqmP

But apparently, you think DS has better feats?

Than this?
https://i.imgur.com/oJovenl.jpg

You are trying to equalise things when it really isn't possible. Deadshot does not do what Bullseye does, even with bullets. This isn't about missing targets, this is about practically doing Toon force feats with household objects. Bullseye opens safes with pebbles; Deadshot does NOT open them with bullets:
https://imgur.com/zfwU0wL

Then that is all anyone had to do instead of troll the thread. Just show Bullseye hitting a target from a farther distance than DS ever has.

So if DS has no feats of hitting something further than 2 miles then Bullseye wins.

Also those other feats are irrelevant here. As throwing and shooting are two different skills. Basically if bullseye can do what DS do with a gun then he wins automatically.

Question : what issue was that 2 mile shot from?

Originally posted by beatboks
Lol at ha1 continuing his BS after DS posted the two mile shot feat.

Like I said Floyd has a few feats at the same level like Koing Enchantress with a shot that creased her brow from a distance that Colonel Flag needed binoculars just to make out which one Enchantress was.

Lester has a lot more feats on that level consistently

Rochochet Rabbit out shoots/aims them both

I didn't see his post until after i replied to Bran

Originally posted by h1a8
Then that is all anyone had to do instead of troll the thread. Just show Bullseye hitting a target from a farther distance than DS ever has.

So if DS has no feats of hitting something further than 2 miles then Bullseye wins.

Also those other feats are irrelevant here. As throwing and shooting are two different skills. Basically if bullseye can do what DS do with a gun then he wins automatically.

Question : what issue was that 2 mile shot from?

My scans also showed him shooting a teleporter with two bullets. Not throwing. So even if throwing feats are irrelevant (it's not), it wasnt a throwing feat, and shows you didn't even bother clicking on the link.

I'm better. I can consistently land a shot on ctdm's sister's mouth from the opposite side of his house.

Originally posted by h1a8
Then that is all anyone had to do instead of troll the thread. Just show Bullseye hitting a target from a farther distance than DS ever has.

So if DS has no feats of hitting something further than 2 miles then Bullseye wins.

Also those other feats are irrelevant here. As throwing and shooting are two different skills. Basically if bullseye can do what DS do with a gun then he wins automatically.

Question : what issue was that 2 mile shot from?

Trolling you? You’re about one step away from becoming a reprobate. Admit when you’re wrong and move on.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
My scans also showed him shooting a teleporter with two bullets. Not throwing. So even if throwing feats are irrelevant (it's not), it wasnt a throwing feat, and shows you didn't even bother clicking on the link.

You assume wrongly. I saw the feat.
I didn't give the reasons why they were irrelevant.
The teleport feat is irrelevant because Bullseye didn't know where guy was going to teleport to before he shot
and there is no proof that BS intended the bullet to end up in that spot (he could he just made the bullet ricochet in random multiple directions to increase the chances of hitting the teleporter.)

If you can throw accurately up to 100 yds away and never miss and i can shoot up to miles away without missing then you are not necessary the better marksman. Imo distance is a huge part of marksmanship (as most can hit something a small distance from them).

Again, what issue was that 2 mile feat in. Just want to verify your scan.

Originally posted by One Big Mob
I know guys who can throw hundreds of yards more accurately than they can shoot. They only get on the paper when their gun is sighted from 300 yards but they can throw a baseball and hit the bullseye from that same distance.

I don't think h1 has ever seen a gun in real life before, or another person. If a pitcher can throw more accurate than they can shoot a sighted in gun to their eye then they've never handled a gun before.

I blame Style for the quote on this one. Why is he in a non woman vs woman thread?