should antivaxxers be imprisoned

Started by Stoic3 pages
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
This must be a troll thread. It is idiotic to suggest someone should be imprisoned or suffer any other penalties for not wanting to have some poison injected into their body, ffs.... smh.

Agreed.

What do we mean by anti-vaxxers? If its simply people who dont want to take it, that should not really concern us (unless its somebody vulnerable and close to us), given its clearly a small minority, so shouldnt impact the herd immunity we are trying to get to through vaccinations.

But the ones who are spreading lies and conspiracy theories which are making whole communities scared to take it, those guys ought to be shot.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Essentially. You don't have the right to make someone else ill because you choose to be irresponsible.
Originally posted by Robtard
Imprisoned, no. But they can't complain if they're restricted from publican schools and such.
this!

Originally posted by -Pr- We can't punish people for stupidity.

😖hifty:
Spoiler:
Ethneo... cough... cough
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
This must be a troll thread. It is idiotic to suggest someone should be imprisoned or suffer any other penalties for not wanting to have some poison injected into their body, ffs.... smh.
dur

Oh pooty.

Why are you so obsessed with me? ❌

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh pooty.

Why are you so obsessed with me? ❌

dur because you are an excellently crafted parody account.

They should effectively be excluded from society. No public schools. No air travel. Get your vaccine passports ready.

disappointed by the results, proportions should be like the reverse lmao

There is a legal question regarding vaccines.

If you chose to not vaccinate...and then its proven that you are responsible for infecting and killing a person with a medical condition that cannot take vaccines...then you can argue that its involuntary manslaughter (or whatever the law is)

Society punishes people who get drunk and kill somebody while driving, how is this any different (aside from that vaccinations is not legally required while drunk driving is breaking the law)

Originally posted by Smasandian
There is a legal question regarding vaccines.

If you chose to not vaccinate...and then its proven that you are responsible for infecting and killing a person with a medical condition that cannot take vaccines...then you can argue that its involuntary manslaughter (or whatever the law is)

Society punishes people who get drunk and kill somebody while driving, how is this any different (aside from that vaccinations is not legally required while drunk driving is breaking the law)

It is also fair to note at one point drunk driving wasn't illegal

Like I said if people personally choose not to take it, that shouldnt be an issue in achieving herd immunity given its a minority.

So no I wouldnt compare to drink driving.

If we punish people for drunk driving, and then punish people for outcomes of drunk driving (for ex...killing somebody).

How can we not punish people for killing people if they chose not to take a vaccine?

Herd immunity is not part of this equation. Yes....we should have herd immunity to diseases like measles..but as proven by the ****wits who decided to stop taking the vaccine..they go to a country without herd immunity, pick it up because they like licking windows and then come back..and give it somebody who cannot have the vaccine...how is that OK (they literally killed somebody)...over somebody who drove drunk.

Originally posted by Smasandian
If we punish people for drunk driving, and then punish people for outcomes of drunk driving (for ex...killing somebody).

How can we not punish people for killing people if they chose not to take a vaccine?

Herd immunity is not part of this equation. Yes....we should have herd immunity to diseases like measles..but as proven by the ****wits who decided to stop taking the vaccine..they go to a country without herd immunity, pick it up because they like licking windows and then come back..and give it somebody who cannot have the vaccine...how is that OK (they literally killed somebody)...over somebody who drove drunk

Well vaccine passports will surely be a thing.

So the punishment will be they wont get all the freedoms we do.

But being capable of passing on a virus is very different to drink driving.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
This must be a troll thread. It is idiotic to suggest someone should be imprisoned or suffer any other penalties for not wanting to have some poison injected into their body, ffs.... smh.
so pre-born are people, but after they're born, they shouldn't get vaccinated. You really are something.

Originally posted by Smasandian
If we punish people for drunk driving, and then punish people for outcomes of drunk driving (for ex...killing somebody).

How can we not punish people for killing people if they chose not to take a vaccine?

Herd immunity is not part of this equation. Yes....we should have herd immunity to diseases like measles..but as proven by the ****wits who decided to stop taking the vaccine..they go to a country without herd immunity, pick it up because they like licking windows and then come back..and give it somebody who cannot have the vaccine...how is that OK (they literally killed somebody)...over somebody who drove drunk.

Not a great analogy as it would be very hard to prove that a given anti-vaxxer mouthbreather caused someone to die due to their idiocy, compared to a drunk driver killing someone due to their idiocy.

We can certainly exclude anti-vaxxers from certain aspects of society though.

Quarantine!

They shouldn't be imprisoned. They should be raped by Backfire.

Been here since 2005 and 'Backfire = Rape' has been a thing since then iirc.

It's good when some things are a constant.

So it's settled. All problems can be solved by being raped by backfire. 🙂

I don't want to be raped by anyone.

Originally posted by Klaw
I don't want to be raped by anyone.
that's the spirit 😛