Image: "Supreme has to win or we're not doing it."
DC: "Superman has to win or we're not doing it."
It doesn't get made. Guess it means Supreme would have won because DC disagreed with Supreme winning so negotiations fell through.
In other words Image wouldn't let Supreme crossover with Superman because Supreme would have lost.
Great debate. I don't understand why negotiations fell through so DC agreeing that Supreme wins is why they didn't do it. Concession accepted DC.
Originally posted by One Big MobThat's not true. Both characters Powers had already been established. There was no taking away or adding on to the abilities. Using that fact it was determined that supreme would win. Now do you think DC wanted their flag boy to get his ass whooped? So image turned to Marvel, and Marvel chose Gladiator, now guess why? Gladiator strength is not set in stone, the more confidence he is, the stronger and more powerful he gets. Now at what point in that comic did this ability activate for Gladiator? It happened when supreme said he would destroy that entire planet. Comics are very easy to comprehend if you know how.
Image: "Supreme has to win or we're not doing it."
DC: "Superman has to win or we're not doing it."It doesn't get made. Guess it means Supreme would have won because DC disagreed with Supreme winning so negotiations fell through.
In other words Image wouldn't let Supreme crossover with Superman because Supreme would have lost.
Great debate. I don't understand why negotiations fell through so DC agreeing that Supreme wins is why they didn't do it. Concession accepted DC.
Originally posted by JBLThat's not true. Both characters Powers had already been established. There was no taking away or adding on to the abilities. Using that fact it was determined that Superman would win. Now do you think Image wanted their flag boy to get his ass whooped?
That's not true. Both characters Powers had already been established. There was no taking away or adding on to the abilities. Using that fact it was determined that supreme would win. Now do you think DC wanted their flag boy to get his ass whooped?
I think this is why you were asked for proof because a normal person would realize both companies wanted their characters to win and they came to an impasse where neither would budge. It's not complicated.
Originally posted by One Big Mobpower for power, strength for strength, ability for ability, it was determine that supreme would win by both companies. Now you're not going to see this written anywhere because that's behind the scene. But image did take jabs at DC. Normal comic book fans can't get behind the scene and hear those little talks. I can.
That's not true. Both characters Powers had already been established. There was no taking away or adding on to the abilities. Using that fact it was determined that Superman would win. Now do you think Image wanted their flag boy to get his ass whooped?I think this is why you were asked for proof because a normal person would realize both companies wanted their characters to win and they came to an impasse where neither would budge. It's not complicated.
Originally posted by One Big MobThat I cannot do. I can only tell you what I know. Now Superman fans will take great offence at what I say because they don't want Superman to lose. But I'm sorry. And just for the record, I wouldn't give a rats ass if Superman would beat supreme into a coma, just so happened supreme was picked to win. I didn't do it, let Superman fans get mad at them.
Post a picture of any comic image from any comic.
What the **** happened here? It's not the first time I'm wrong, and I don't mind being wrong either. The reason I'm provocative in debates is because I like debating and it conditions people who don't like to debate to engage and stick around.
The mistake I made was that the ds² expressed both the gravitational- and electromagnetic potential, and it wasn't obvious that it only expressed the gravitational potential because the expression I used used relativistic units, c = G = K = 1. And so you're only left with the variables r, θ, ɸ, q, and m. Since I assumed that ds² also expressed the electromagnetic potential, I assumed that it also had set the particle charge = 1 (which makes sense since you can talk about free protons and electrons), and to say that particle charge doesn't matter for electromagnetic potential in an electromagnetic field is retarded. This would've been resolved a lot quicker if I looked it up on Wikipedia, or if Magnon had a proper grasp of what he was talking about. But it's not a biggie.
Originally posted by JBL
Image made it clear that " NO MAN OF STEEL CAN BEAT SUPREME" .. Now what do you think that mean? Why do you think Image took a shot at DC in that gladiator/supreme comic by mentioning Superman? There's your proof. Anything else??
Originally posted by CaptainStoic
Actually Liefeld said that no man of steel could beat Supreme, when asked if Colossus stood a chance against him.
Originally posted by TricksterPriest
...........Rob Liefeld is an idiot. 😛If it's Liefeld's Supreme, he loses by default.
But if it's Moore's supreme, that's another story. I can't call that fight. hmm
Originally posted by One Big Mob
Just like I thought, you're just an h1 who asks for proof at every chance but can't post links to anything even any comic scan out of the millions.I think I speak for everyone when I say I can trust a guy like this to have insider info. Great convo. Learned a lot.
😂 👆
I've asked him even in this very thread for a quantifiable feat from Hulk, but he's too scared to even engage. He knows I know of Hulk's fears, and I'd just scared of getting trapped.
Originally posted by One Big MobSuperman fans will take great offence at what I say.... Great convo. But I already knew this was coming 👍
Just like I thought, you're just an h1 who asks for proof at every chance but can't post links to anything even any comic scan out of the millions.I think I speak for everyone when I say I can trust a guy like this to have insider info. Great convo. Learned a lot.
Originally posted by JBL
Image made it clear that " NO MAN OF STEEL CAN BEAT SUPREME" .. Now what do you think that mean? Why do you think Image took a shot at DC in that gladiator/supreme comic by mentioning Superman? There's your proof. Anything else??
This is an utterly retarded statement. Post actual evidence to this claim.