Isn't Mangog.....magic? His strength, size, durability, speed etc all based on magic?
So siphoning his magic would.....weaken his physical attributes.
I don't see what's the issue here?
Like siphoning the electricity from Iron Man. His strength, speed, etc will all be affected - because electricity is what he runs on.
@h1a8
Thor comments on Mangog's magic failing him when, you know, he is completely failing with his attacks - charge and punches.
And siphon = drain in this case, you turd.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I don't see what's the issue here?
h1 is a retarded troll, that's the only issue here.
Bran said it the best:
Originally posted by One Big Mob
While I doubt h1 could read any comic without googling half the words and then googling those words so he understands it, it's pretty surprising he can't read words in the specific pretty pictures the feats come from.For everything people say about Alberto, at least he tries to manipulate scenes with his own view of proof and scans. H1 just knows of a couple pretty picture scenes and none of the context. He might be the least knowledgeable person on this board and his aptitude for learning is non existent.
It's like someone taught a dog how to use one website and pre-loaded it with key phrases so it could get a treat and then they abandoned it. He's just been sitting there for years waiting for his owners to come back from their drunken drive in a blizzard so they can shake his paw again.
If you look at it like that he's a pretty smart dog, but if you view him as a person he is legally retarded. I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he's just a good boy though.
Maybe he was Raz's dog...
Originally posted by Diesldude
Maybe H1 was having a bad day? It was pretty obvious from the scans that were posted.
It's called Monday night quarterbacking. Clearly I know AFTER the scan was posted. But Stilt and Bran was acting like I'm retarded as if the scan was just posted prior to my comments and I ignored it.
Then you have stilt and Titan actually lying. They were claiming that Mangog was drained (instead of have some of his energy siphoned). Then stilt lies again by stating it there were 3 pages of proof (when only a single panel proves it in Thor's comments). Using exaggeration to the point of lying implies that the original point was weak and couldn't stand on its own.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Isn't Mangog.....magic? His strength, size, durability, speed etc all based on magic?So siphoning his magic would.....weaken his physical attributes.
I don't see what's the issue here?Like siphoning the electricity from Iron Man. His strength, speed, etc will all be affected - because electricity is what he runs on.
Mangog also has magical abilities outside physical strength. It's all about the writer's intentions. A writer can have a character been siphoned and yet not any weaker physically. This is fiction. Also Remember energy and power are two different things. Power is the rate energy is being used. Ironman can probably output a max of 1million watts but has 100 million joules of energy.
With that said, I do believe the writer was referring to Mangog's physical strength with Thor's comments.
But that wasn't the point. I accepted that Mangog was weaker than normal (by how much is anyone's guess). The problem is Stilt and Titan was trying to lie and exaggerate using words like Mangog was drained. Siphoning SOME of someone's energy isn't them being drained (as in completely or mostly out of energy). Then they were acting like everyone should have known that BEFORE the evidence was posted.
When many posters for years have used that feat to argue how powerful RKT is (without explaining that Mangog was weaker than normal). I admit to never reading that comic.
The correct answer is Thor obviously.
if we're talking Old Man Dione.
616 Thanos can not kill a skyfather, much less Galactus, without an amp. The fact 616 Thanos beat old Thanos without an amp proves that the future Thanos either had serious upgrades we weren't told about, or that the high cosmics he beat were a lot weaker then 616.
Either way, the King Thanos we did see isn't beating normal Skyfather Thor, let alone a Super Skyfather.
Originally posted by cdtmYou need to actually read the story and understand the context.
The correct answer is Thor obviously.if we're talking Old Man Dione.
616 Thanos can not kill a skyfather, much less Galactus, without an amp. The fact 616 Thanos beat old Thanos without an amp proves that the future Thanos either had serious upgrades we weren't told about, or that the high cosmics he beat were a lot weaker then 616.
Either way, the King Thanos we did see isn't beating normal Skyfather Thor, let alone a Super Skyfather.
It was stated on panel king Thanos become more powerful with age(the older be became his power grew) He one shot killed Odin who had Thors hammer. King Thanos wanted young Thanos to kill him, he allowed him to beat on him, again flat out stated on panel. Before KT revealed he wanted to die at the hands of young Thanos he laughed off young Thanos attack and practically one shotted him putting him in his place.
Originally posted by h1a8Your lies and bullshit twisting are as laughable as your argument you clown.
It's called Monday night quarterbacking. Clearly I know AFTER the scan was posted. But Stilt and Bran was acting like I'm retarded as if the scan was just posted prior to my comments and I ignored it.Then you have stilt and Titan actually lying. They were claiming that Mangog was drained (instead of have some of his energy siphoned). Then stilt lies again by stating it there were 3 pages of proof (when only a single panel proves it in Thor's comments). Using exaggeration to the point of lying implies that the original point was weak and couldn't stand on its own.
Mangog also has magical abilities outside physical strength. It's all about the writer's intentions. A writer can have a character been siphoned and yet not any weaker physically. This is fiction. Also Remember energy and power are two different things. Power is the rate energy is being used. Ironman can probably output a max of 1million watts but has 100 million joules of energy.
With that said, I do believe the writer was referring to Mangog's physical strength with Thor's comments.
But that wasn't the point. I accepted that Mangog was weaker than normal (by how much is anyone's guess). The problem is Stilt and Titan was trying to lie and exaggerate using words like Mangog was drained. Siphoning SOME of someone's energy isn't them being drained (as in completely or mostly out of energy). Then they were acting like everyone should have known that BEFORE the evidence was posted.
When many posters for years have used that feat to argue how powerful RKT is (without explaining that Mangog was weaker than normal). I admit to never reading that comic.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
You need to actually read the story and understand the context.It was stated on panel king Thanos become more powerful with age(the older be became his power grew) He one shot killed Odin who had Thors hammer. King Thanos wanted young Thanos to kill him, he allowed him to beat on him, again flat out stated on panel. Before KT revealed he wanted to die at the hands of young Thanos he laughed off young Thanos attack and practically one shotted him putting him in his place.
KT didn't lower his durability so that Thanos could kill him. His durability was already at the level where Thanos has the power output to kill him.
You are confusing power output with durability. Clearly KT has impressive power output (more than Thanos himself). No one is arguing that.
Originally posted by h1a8Shut you complete idiot. Young Thanos didn’t come anywhere close to killing him, he bloodied his face up that it’s even with KT letting him do that. As usual youre lowballing Thanos physically, you’re ignoring the fact Thanos killed Surfer is around 5-6 punches casually yet with over double that amount he could on bloody up KT face (as KT stated on panel , young Thanos fought like he never had before not holding anything back) KT killed Odin W/Molnjir in one blast. RKT has nothing to compare to that.
KT didn't lower his durability so that Thanos could kill him. His durability was already at the level where Thanos has the power output to kill him.You are confusing power output with durability. Clearly KT has impressive power output (more than Thanos himself). No one is arguing that.
You’ve offered nothing on RKT actual power physical or not. You should have learned your lesson after getting humiliated with the Mangog stuff troll.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
Shut you complete idiot. Young Thanos didn’t come anywhere close to killing him, he bloodied his face up that it’s even with KT letting him do that. As usual youre lowballing Thanos physically, you’re ignoring the fact Thanos killed Surfer is around 5-6 punches casually yet with over double that amount he could on bloody up KT face (as KT stated on panel , young Thanos fought like he never had before not holding anything back) KT killed Odin W/Molnjir in one blast. RKT has nothing to compare to that.You’ve offered nothing on RKT actual power physical or not. You should have learned your lesson after getting humiliated with the Mangog stuff troll.
Im not lowballing Thanos. King Thor disintegrating Caps shield, decapitating Destroyer, etc is far more impressive.
And Thanos did that with EXTREME effort in what would appear as a low showing for Surfer. More lies to exaggerate the truth.
Originally posted by h1a8😂 He only decapitated the destroyer because the visor was open and the serpent wrecked caps shield so it’s not that impressive. Odin was killed in one blast by KT, you have nothing that comes close to that.
Im not lowballing Thanos. King Thor disintegrating Caps shield, decapitating Destroyer, etc is far more impressive.And Thanos did that with EXTREME effort in what would appear as a low showing for Surfer. More lies to exaggerate the truth.
So again you’re lowballing, it was Casual for Thanos as everyone has seen. Let’s see you post these extreme effort scans you claim about.
You have nothing and never have, you’ve been exposed as a troll and a liar again.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
😂 He only decapitated the destroyer because the visor was open and the serpent wrecked caps shield so it’s not that impressive. Odin was killed in one blast by KT, you have nothing that comes close to that.So again you’re lowballing, it was Casual for Thanos as everyone has seen. Let’s see you post these extreme effort scans you claim about.
You have nothing and never have, you’ve been exposed as a troll and a liar again.
The shield still gets its feats. The serpent breaking the shield is a testament to how powerful the serpent was and not how weak the shield was. Otherwise I can give low showings for Surfer to make Thanos feat not very impressive. It goes both ways.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTWI meant disintegrated part of the shield. Everyone knows what I meant. We all seen the feat.
He didn't disintegrate Cap's shield. He only damaged it, most of it was intact.Why are you so retarded, h1a8?
Originally posted by Insane TitanThe fifth hit clearly shows the strain on Thanos face. Also, Thanos was amping his blows with energy. Why do you think that is?
Just to show that h1 constantly lies through his piss stained teeth
Thanos doesn’t come close to exerting him self, silently crushing surfer. hell in the last panel he’s even smiling
The difference is clear with Thanos going full tilt and pissed off crunting.