Originally posted by Adam_PoE
The Texas Voter Confidence Act, filed by Republican Representative Steve Toth, would authorize the governor, the lieutenant governor, and the speaker of the House—all of whom are Republicans—to select an independent third party to conduct an election audit. The review would focus on the votes cast in Texas' 13 counties with populations over 415,000.That is especially notable, because there would only be increased scrutiny of the results in areas where Republicans did not win.
When asked why he did not include smaller counties in the election review, Toth replied, "What's the point? I mean, all the small counties are red."
The proposed exercise is not about "election integrity." It is about the Republican effort to characterize election results in "red" areas as inherently valid and election results in "blue" areas as inherently suspect.
Today, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.; Reed Smith, LLP; and The Arc filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of the Houston Area Urban League; Houston Justice; Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.; and The Arc of Texas challenging S.B. 1, a new Texas law targeting voting rights.
S.B. 1 includes a series of suppressive voting-related provisions that will make it much harder for Texas residents to vote and disenfranchise some altogether, particularly black and latino voters, and voters with disabilities.
The lawsuit, which was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, argues that S.B. 1 violates the First, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by intentionally targeting and burdening methods and means of voting used by voters of color.
The Plaintiffs also claim that the law violates the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act by imposing voting barriers that will discriminate against voters with disabilities and deny people with disabilities full and equal opportunities to participate in the state's voting programs.
The lawsuit challenges multiple provisions in S.B. 1, including:
[list][*]Limitations on early voting hours and a ban on 24-hour voting
[*]The elimination of drive-thru voting centers
[*]The prohibition of mail-in ballot drop-boxes
[*]Limitations on the distribution of mail-in ballot applications
[*]Limitations and possible penalties for voter assistants, including criminal felonies[/list]