Originally posted by truejedino, that would be wrong. I was thinking of a lady who got drunk and let a guy sex her, not a lady who was forcibly intoxicated and got gangraped. Wtf? No!
No, that's awful. That's right in line with "she was asking for it." Being passed out drunk isn't an invitation. That's flat out awful. Then trying to get girls drunk enough so they pass out becomes an actual horrible strategy for someone.Tell me this: if a girl is passed out drunk, and her boyfriend sleeps with her without consent, would it then also be considered legal for him to call four friends to also come take a turn? If so, why not, in light of what you wrote above?
Originally posted by Blakemore
no, that would be wrong. I was thinking of a lady who got drunk and let a guy sex her, not a lady who was forcibly intoxicated and got gangraped. Wtf? No!
The problem is, how do you differentiate? The law is black and white so there isn't a lot of "he said/she said". She said she was passed out drunk and he had sex with her, he says they were both intoxicated, and they had sex. What does the law do with that?
Originally posted by Blakemore
Your friends sound bad
I'm too young to have ever been a hippie.
Talking more about people who were 23 in 1960, well before I was born.
Some of the stories you hear suggest the "free love" thing was a lie, and it was just an extended frat party across the nation where naive people were taken advantage of.
I feel like the underlying point is that way more people got away with forcing non-consentual sex in the past. this would be true. the farther back in time you go, the more this applies. rape committed by invading armies was once considered a right of the conqueror. that changes because our attitudes evolve. still trying to figure out how bill cosby belongs in the topic, since he's a serial rapist of children
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I feel like the underlying point is that way more people got away with forcing non-consentual sex in the past. this would be true. the farther back in time you go, the more this applies. rape committed by invading armies was once considered a right of the conqueror. that changes because our attitudes evolve. still trying to figure out how bill cosby belongs in the topic, since he's a serial rapist of children
Oh, I'm not defending Cosby in any way, shape, or form. I totally believe he drugged up young girls and took advantage of them.
I made the post when I realized he was 23 in 1960, and got to wondering just how much an an anomaly he is. Wouldn't surprise me at all if a lot of the people in his generation pointing fingers at him weren't secretly thinking "Better him then me!"