Invincible vs Conquest

Started by cdtm1 pages

Invincible vs Conquest

Personally, I think Conquest beat Conquest. All the times he had Mark on the ropes and didn't press the advantage, just to have his fun.

Both are bloodlusted, trying to end it as soon as possible, and fighting smart.

Mark.

I don't know, re-reading through those fight Conquest was totally toying with Mark.

Practically stuck out his chin and said "Come on, harder! Harder!"

Its like Nolan said, he's a spectator to his own fights. He'll intentionally draw things out over going for the sure kill.

In the first fight Conquest would probably have won if not for the interference. In the second fight Invincible won on his own, and this was issue 70...something.

At the end of the series Invincible was up there with Thragg.

By the last issue Mark was implied to beat Allen too, which is impressive since he barely had a scratch on him.

Originally posted by Astner
In the first fight Conquest would probably have won if not for the interference. In the second fight Invincible won on his own, and this was issue 70...something.

At the end of the series Invincible was up there with Thragg.

Conquest was distracted by Marks bro. Knocked him aside and chased kid Invincible just to torture him, leaving himself open to a back tackle.

EoS Mark should be able to toy with Conquest. That wouldn't be in character though, so he two-pieces him.