Godzilla vs Hulk and Thor

Started by marcssands142 pages

Final bump

No reason to bump. Godzilla outclasses them in all categories. Including skill and intelligence. He also looks cooler. And outside of Mjolnir he is way faster

Originally posted by Psychotron
Thor has never used the Bifrost offensively, though. Those instances you mentioned were accidental when Thor was just using it to travel.

Using it that way accidentally is still a legit on screen showing though.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
1)None of those th ok ngs you listed are even remotely comparable to a creature that can tank the full force of a nuke bigger than a tzar bomb with its eyes open. And Godzilla's breath attack absolutely shits on the bifrost.

2)If LEFT UNCHECKED the bifrost could destroy the outer layer of a planet.

1) Not sure how impressed the tanking the Nuke or the breath attack will be to a guy whose taken the full might of a Star.

Lets not forget his own lightning can destroy entire landscapes.

2) No idea how youve decided it can only destroy the “outer layer” of a planet.

————————————-

Anyway Godzilla wins for now. Hulk is a non factor.

Movie Thor really needs more and better showings of absorbing energy attacks with Mjolnir/Stormbreaker.

Well we've only ever seen it damage Jotunheim. And it's very clear that Asgard and Jotunheim are "planets" like a small village with 30 people can be called a "city".

They're big floating islands in space, not actual planets. Asgard is a big city with not even 10,000 people loving there. And Jotunheim is a big tundra/ice plain. So damaging a floating island is not as impressive as damaging a legit planet like Earth.

And if you think Thor's gonna tank an attack made up of heat and radiation that bored through several miles of Earth(like an amped up Bitfrost) in a very short time frame, then that's just silly.

Originally posted by KingD19
Well we've only ever seen it damage Jotunheim. And it's very clear that Asgard and Jotunheim are "planets" like a small village with 30 people can be called a "city".

They're big floating islands in space, not actual planets. Asgard is a big city with not even 10,000 people loving there. And Jotunheim is a big tundra/ice plain. So damaging a floating island is not as impressive as damaging a legit planet like Earth.

And if you think Thor's gonna tank an attack made up of heat and radiation that bored through several miles of Earth(like an amped up Bitfrost) in a very short time frame, then that's just silly.

What makes you say that only 10000 people live in Asgard?

Originally posted by FrothByte
What makes you say that only 10000 people live in Asgard?

In Loki, when he sees the report on the event of Ragnarok that wiped out his people in his timeline, it says the number of casualties 9,719 and it says in big bold letters, "Entire Civilization" wiped out or something along those lines as well as "Complete Planetary Destruction", which we know happened when Surtur stabbed it in Ragnarok the movie.

So about 10,000(actually 9,719 or 9,720 if Loki wasn't counted among those) people lived in the entirety of Asgard, and going by all the shots and visuals we've seen of it, it's about the size of a large city, and is also as I said, a large island floating in space.

Originally posted by KingD19
Well we've only ever seen it damage Jotunheim. And it's very clear that Asgard and Jotunheim are "planets" like a small village with 30 people can be called a "city".

They're big floating islands in space, not actual planets. Asgard is a big city with not even 10,000 people loving there. And Jotunheim is a big tundra/ice plain. So damaging a floating island is not as impressive as damaging a legit planet like Earth.

Fair enough. But even city busting is still pretty powerful.

Heck even Thor's lightning can disintegrate Landscapes the size of a city.

Originally posted by KingD19
And if you think Thor's gonna tank an attack made up of heat and radiation that bored through several miles of Earth(like an amped up Bitfrost) in a very short time frame, then that's just silly.

Why? He took the full force of a Star for a fair bit before it KO'd him.

That said the movies really need to have Mjolnir/Stormbreaker absorbing massive energy blasts the way Kong's Axe absorbed Godzilla's atomic breath. That's a big power/ability missing for movie Thor.

Until that happens I admit Thor loses.

Godzilla FTW.

https://youtu.be/mocIrhUC1Eg

Hulk is a non factor Thor literally can’t hurt him and gets stepped on or vaporized by his atomic breath

Originally posted by carthage
Hulk is a non factor Thor literally can’t hurt him and gets stepped on or vaporized by his atomic breath

Somewhere Haulk fan just died inside.

So Thor either takes out Godzilla by calling down the Bifrost on him, as Godzilla can't dodge that, or Thor uses Stormbreaker, the weapon that casually shrugged off the full might of the Infinity Gauntlet to fly threw Godzilla's head and brain him. The latter is far more likely.

Now watch the Godzilla fanboys claim that Godzilla > Thanos with the Infinity Gauntlet. Reality is, Thanos could take out Godzilla with a single stone.

^ He defended against Surturs flames as well by spinning Mjolnir.

But obviously overpowering a full gauntlet trumps that.

Thanos should be able to take out anyone with a single stone but he was kind of a failure couldn't even kill people by throwing a moon at them.

Stormbreaker would be less than a needle going into Godzilla. One hit simply wouldn't do it. I don't think y'all are comprehending how small stormbreaker is to Godzilla.

If an ant threw an antaxe through your head, it wouldn't kill you.

A needle infused with enough magical power to counter all six infinity stones.

That's okay though, Thor can do it more than once if need be, it's not like Godzilla can hit a fast moving flying target that small.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Using it that way accidentally is still a legit on screen showing though.

1) Not sure how impressed the tanking the Nuke or the breath attack will be to a guy whose taken the full might of a Star.

Lets not forget his own lightning can destroy entire landscapes.

2) No idea how youve decided it can only destroy the “outer layer” of a planet.

————————————-

Anyway Godzilla wins for now. Hulk is a non factor.

Movie Thor really needs more and better showings of absorbing energy attacks with Mjolnir/Stormbreaker.

In the forums we must prove that characters will not only think of a particular tactic but also have the propensity to do that tactic.

Nuke heat >>>>> neutron star heat.

Originally posted by Robtard
A needle infused with enough magical power to counter all six infinity stones.

That's okay though, Thor can do it more than once if need be, it's not like Godzilla can hit a fast moving flying target that small.

It was a durability feat from Stormbreaker. It wasn't like the blast was pushing Stormbreaker with a bazillion tons of force or something. The blast was trying to destroy the hammer.

So yes, hammer is more durable than Godzilla and can go through Godzilla if Thor can generate enough force or momentum (or a sufficient combination of the two).