Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
The thing is legalisation, didn't improve the damage done to families, crimes caused under the influence, including collateral fallout. Medical and psychological care needed for those damaged...
I totally agree but we know we can't just ban it and make it so ppl never use again, my thoughts are to simply keep ppl out of a legal system that can wreck them without even thinking about other consequences.
Originally posted by snowdragonfair enough but coke for instance has a habit of getting people aggressive.
I totally agree but we know we can't just ban it and make it so ppl never use again, my thoughts are to simply keep ppl out of a legal system that can wreck them without even thinking about other consequences.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
fair enough but coke for instance has a habit of getting people aggressive.
Yeah crack has a super high rate of addiction too but we know that certain groups are hit harder by drugs and drug crimes so better to treat an addict than make another victim of our legal system that gets them ostracized from much of functional society, imo.
Originally posted by snowdragon
Yeah crack has a super high rate of addiction too but we know that certain groups are hit harder by drugs and drug crimes so better to treat an addict than make another victim of our legal system that gets them ostracized from much of functional society, imo.
What if one refuses treatment?
Or repeatedly offends?
https://mises.org/wire/no-decriminalization-marijuana-not-better-legalization
This article surprised me to read.
I figured the default libertarian case would be decriminalization, but this article argues for legalization, taxation, and regulation.
Not sure, if this is interesting to non libertarians or not.
Originally posted by Robtard
Alcohol is very likely the most destructive.
New research just came out that it's a Neuro toxin and detrimental at any level of consumption.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/19/health/alcohol-brain-health-intl-scli-wellness/index.html
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
But is that just because it's legalised and more widely used?
I see your point, but I really don't know. During the 13years of prohibition, while alcohol consumption feel sharply in year one, it steadily rose to at least 70% of is pre-prohibition levels. Some argue it was higher.
But my point is, if were going to allow and regulate a drug that is top-tier destructive, kinda silly to not do it for others. I've never tried cocaine, crack cocaine, meth, LSD, MDMA or heroine, should they be decriminalized or legalized tomorrow, I still wouldn't try them.