Order by Durability

Started by h1a822 pages

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Order by Durability

Originally posted by FrothByte
Well you certainly don't base it on simply eyeballing flying debris. If you're talking about detonation velocity, the particles there aren't visible to the naked eye. So one wonders how exactly you're coming up with them being slower than a bullet. Even then, that's still not how you measure the destructiveness of an explosion.

Go and learn about explosions first please before posting again.

Particles are extremely visible. You have to be blind not to see them.
As proof to the fact you don't know what you are talking about.
You are avoiding the question.

Originally posted by h1a8
How do you compute the strength of an explosion acting on an outside target then? Since the speed in which the particles hitting the target doesn't matter.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Order by Durability

Originally posted by h1a8
Particles are extremely visible. You have to be blind not to see them.
As proof to the fact you don't know what you are talking about.
You are avoiding the question.

Prove that the particles are extremely visible. .

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Order by Durability

Originally posted by FrothByte
Prove that the particles are extremely visible. .

Watch the scene. If you cant see any particles protrude from the so called explosion then you are blind.

You thinking the CGI wasn't realistic enough doesn't prove it was weak.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Order by Durability

Originally posted by h1a8
Watch the scene. If you cant see any particles protrude from the so called explosion then you are blind.

Post the scene and point out which particles you're referring to.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You thinking the CGI wasn't realistic enough doesn't prove it was weak.
There's nothing to prove it was strong either (at least as strong as actual explosives). Therefore, one cannot argue how powerful the explosion was and Thor had 0 feats supporting him being aircraft bullet resistant.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Order by Durability

Originally posted by FrothByte
Post the scene and point out which particles you're referring to.

At 3:46
Even iron man doesn't receive any damage.

https://youtu.be/s6CR-Gpsptk

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Order by Durability

Originally posted by h1a8
At 3:46
Even iron man doesn't receive any damage.

https://youtu.be/s6CR-Gpsptk

Went to 3:46, don't see any explosion particles. Unless you're referring to the debris? If you're referring to the debris then you're even stupider than I thought.

Also, Ironman want at the center of the explosion like Thor was.

Originally posted by h1a8
There's nothing to prove it was strong either (at least as strong as actual explosives). Therefore, one cannot argue how powerful the explosion was and Thor had 0 feats supporting him being aircraft bullet resistant.

Of course there was. Try watching the movies.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor had 0 feats supporting him being aircraft bullet resistant.

Except for that bit at the start of the video you posted in your very next post when he gets shot by aircraft bullets

Originally posted by h1a8
At 3:46
Even iron man doesn't receive any damage.

https://youtu.be/s6CR-Gpsptk

Originally posted by h1a8
Therefore, one cannot argue how powerful the explosion was

Except the fact that it was powerful enough to disintegrate Sokovia facepalm

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Except for that bit at the start of the video you posted in your very next post when he gets shot by aircraft bullets

Already pointed that out. He just denies Thor got hit. And points to him moving his head as him being scared.

He's clearly competing for the highest level of trolling on KMC.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Except the fact that it was powerful enough to disintegrate Sokovia facepalm

Already pointed that out. He just denies Thor got hit. And points to him moving his head as him being scared.

He's clearly competing for the highest level of trolling on KMC.

We are talking about the force on Thor, not what was happening inside Sokovia that made it fall apart. Thor ducked.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Except for that bit at the start of the video you posted in your very next post when he gets shot by aircraft bullets
Thor wasn't shown to get hit.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Of course there was. Try watching the movies.

Concession accepted

Originally posted by FrothByte
Went to 3:46, don't see any explosion particles. Unless you're referring to the debris? If you're referring to the debris then you're even stupider than I thought.

Also, Ironman want at the center of the explosion like Thor was.

Debris, shrapnel, who gives a $&@“. The fact that nothing moved faster than a bullet to hit Thor tells us that the force was weak as shit.

Large shock wave = large velocity of particles.
Low shock wave = small velocity of particles

It's called common sense.

h1: Withstanding the explosion isn't impressive because Thor ducked.

LOL!!!!!!

Not that we need to see Thor being hit by aircraft bullets to know he's resistant to them, as he's taken far greater hits and explosions, but here is Thor being hit with aircraft bullets; he was fine afterwards, went on to tank the Sokovia explosion:

Originally posted by h1a8
Concession accepted

Debris, shrapnel, who gives a $&@“. The fact that nothing moved faster than a bullet to hit Thor tells us that the force was weak as shit.

Large shock wave = large velocity of particles.
Low shock wave = small velocity of particles

It's called common sense.

Dang, so you really did mean the debris? I mean, I knew you were stupid but not that stupid.

You really don't see the faulty logic in comparing a tiny, aerodynamic bullet with irregularly-shaped flying debris that's hundreds or thousands the size and mass of a bullet?

Jeeze dude. You've said some dumb things in the past but this is next level.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Dang, so you really did mean the debris? I mean, I knew you were stupid but not that stupid.

You really don't see the faulty logic in comparing a tiny, aerodynamic bullet with irregularly-shaped flying debris that's hundreds or thousands the size and mass of a bullet?

Jeeze dude. You've said some dumb things in the past but this is next level.

How many times has h1 argued that writers intention trumps what a movie actually shows?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Dang, so you really did mean the debris? I mean, I knew you were stupid but not that stupid.

You really don't see the faulty logic in comparing a tiny, aerodynamic bullet with irregularly-shaped flying debris that's hundreds or thousands the size and mass of a bullet?

Jeeze dude. You've said some dumb things in the past but this is next level.

but we also saw tiny objects too. Doesn't matter the size. Thor wasn't hit by anything traveling faster than a bullet.

You have nothing to prove the blast pressure. Explosions from non explosives = unknown blast pressure at best and weak blast pressure viewing the tiny particles.

Originally posted by Robtard
Not that we need to see Thor being hit by aircraft bullets to know he's resistant to them, as he's taken far greater hits and explosions, but here is Thor being hit with aircraft bullets; he was fine afterwards, went on to tank the Sokovia explosion:

Nothing shows Thor getting struck by a bullet. You are merely speculating.