In regards to Thor's Nidavellir feat: It wasn't just heat resistance, like sticking your head in an oven and being okay. There was a concentrated blast from the star coming at him, it would have had massive levels of radiation and force behind it.
The writers even went out of their way to explain this for the people too stupid to get what was happening in front of them: "You understand, boy, you're about to take the full force of a star. It'll kill you." -Etri
Originally posted by Robtard
In regards to Thor's Nidavellir feat: It wasn't just heat resistance, like sticking your head in an oven and being okay. There was a concentrated blast from the star coming at him, it would have had massive levels of radiation and force behind it.The writers even went out of their way to explain this for the people too stupid to get what was happening in front of them: "You understand, boy, you're about to take the full force of a star. It'll kill you." -Etri
The force was weak. Thor's acceleration was small.
Radiation is not force. It heats things up.
Full force of star = full heat of star
Heat (not force) used to melt the metal per writer's intent.
Figurative language. Common sense.
Like i said. Thor can still be punched in the face and damaged. He can still be stabbed. Blunt force and stabbing force has nothing to do that feat.
Originally posted by h1a8
The force was weak. Thor's acceleration was small.
Radiation is not force. It heats things up.Full force of star = full heat of star
Heat (not force) used to melt the metal per writer's intent.Figurative language. Common sense.
Like i said. Thor can still be punched in the face and damaged. He can still be stabbed. Blunt force and stabbing force has nothing to do that feat.
Funny thing is that Thor probably has the best stabbing/slashing resistance feats here other than Mjolnir.
Originally posted by h1a8
neither has thor. but thor got stabbed and they didnt. ergo he loses.
Thor got stabbed multiple times by Hela and wasn't seriously injured. Thor has taken a sword slash to the chest in the opening fight in TDW without it damaging him at all. He took a sword slash to the face from Hela and only lost an eye instead of getting his face cut in half.
Please provide better stab/slash resistance feats from Zod and Wonder Woman.
Originally posted by FrothByteWhether you believe Thor was as injured in relation to Mjolnir or Zod (Lmao) has no bearing on weapons completely penetrating him.
Thor got stabbed multiple times by Hela and wasn't seriously injured. Thor has taken a sword slash to the chest in the opening fight in TDW without it damaging him at all. He took a sword slash to the face from Hela and only lost an eye instead of getting his face cut in half.Please provide better stab/slash resistance feats from Zod and Wonder Woman.
John Wick wasn't serious injured either. Does that mean his body can withstand being stabbed or shot?
You mean Thor's armor withstood being penetrated in TDW.
The fact that Thor was cut and stabbed by random knives and blades automatically means his durability against cutting is worst.
Originally posted by h1a8The fact that Thor was cut and stabbed by random knives and blades automatically means his durability against cutting is worst.
Nice. I guess following that logic we can say that Aunt May is more durable than Wonder Woman since she never got hurt in the movies whereas Diana actually gets beat up here and there.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Nice. I guess following that logic we can say that Aunt May is more durable than Wonder Woman since she never got hurt in the movies whereas Diana actually gets beat up here and there.
And i guess by your logic since Mjolnir does not have cutting resistance feats then aunt may is at least equal to it cutting force durability. That is your reasoning for people Thor above Mjolnir and vibranium.
See, it can go both ways.
Originally posted by h1a8
And i guess by your logic since Mjolnir does not have cutting resistance feats then aunt may is at least equal to it cutting force durability. That is your reasoning for people Thor above Mjolnir and vibranium.
See, it can go both ways.
Except that Mjolnir actually has better stab/slash resistance feats than Thor.
Originally posted by FrothByteCorrect. That's is the flaw of the thread.
There is no single "bestest of them all" kind of durability feat. You have to take into consideration different feats from puncture resistance to heat resistance to blunt trauma resistance, etc.You also can't claim explosions are "weak sauce" when a number of the characters here haven't taken on huge explosions before. I mean, what explosion durability feats does Zod have? Or puncture resistance for that matter?
Thor is top of the list for heat resistance.
Zod should be tops for blunt force (or pressure).
So Kurse or Thanos can't withstand an explosion because they have no explosion feats? That's stupid logic. Explosions (Less than nuclear) should be survivable for characters of that magnitude.
Its all about pressure anyway. Withstanding x amount of pressure implies that same pressure can be withstood in ANY FORM.
Originally posted by FrothByteAccording to you, Thor has better cut resistant feats than Ultron.
Except that Mjolnir actually has better stab/slash resistance feats than Thor.
Originally posted by h1a8
Correct. That's is the flaw of the thread.Thor is top of the list for heat resistance.
Zod should be tops for blunt force (or pressure).So Kurse or Thanos can't withstand an explosion because they have no explosion feats? That's stupid logic. Explosions (Less than nuclear) should be survivable for characters of that magnitude.
Its all about pressure anyway. Withstanding x amount of pressure implies that same pressure can be withstood in ANY FORM.According to you, Thor has better cut resistant feats than Ultron.
Thanos has explosion feats
Originally posted by h1a8
Correct. That's is the flaw of the thread.Thor is top of the list for heat resistance.
Zod should be tops for blunt force (or pressure).So Kurse or Thanos can't withstand an explosion because they have no explosion feats? That's stupid logic. Explosions (Less than nuclear) should be survivable for characters of that magnitude.
Its all about pressure anyway. Withstanding x amount of pressure implies that same pressure can be withstood in ANY FORM.According to you, Thor has better cut resistant feats than Ultron.
Look H1, everyone can see what you're doing here. You're trying to distract and worm your way out of actually having to provide feats.
You know the golden rule in the MvF, you back up your arguments with feats, not with made-up mental gymnastics.
If you want to claim that Zod or WW have better cut/puncture resistance than Thor then you actually need to provide feats of them doing so. It's that simple. Until you can actually back yourself up with feats, you're not worth talking to.