The lab theory seems more and more credible, China pressured the WHO to dismiss it, which they originally did, however in recent days the WHO has resumed its investigation into and speculates that a Wuhan scientist was infected. If Trump actually knew how to communicate instead of being like a man child the theory would have gained more steam. As of now the only people that don’t want the theory to be true is China and it’s sympathizers.
CNN: Senior Biden officials finding that Covid lab leak theory as credible as natural origins explanation
WP: China pressured WHO to dismisss lab theory, What are they hiding.
NYT: A Group of Scientists Presses a Case Against the Lab Leak Theory of Covid
Basic recent news anyone can find who uses google.
Let me remember..... Hiv was a biological weapon created by the U.S. government. It was tested in Africa because those people were expendable in the eyes of the elite white leaders in the U.S.
Moritz Kaposi was a real genius. He created it in the 1870s and gave it to the U. S. government knowing they were patient enough to wait until the right opportunity arose to test it out. At least that is what I was asked to believe.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Pepperidge farms remembers this now familiar viral conspiracy theory.Covid-19 conspiracy shit seems so familiar now. Doesn't it?
https://khn.org/morning-breakout/dr00026171/
HIV ‘Created by Scientist’ for Biological Warfare, Nobel Peace Prize Winner Says
Kenyan ecologist Wangari Maathai -- who on Friday became the first African woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize -- on Saturday repeated her previous claims that HIV was "created by a scientist for biological warfare," AFP/Yahoo! News reports. In August, Kenya's East African Standard quoted Maathai as saying that HIV/AIDS was created by scientists "for the purpose of mass extermination," according to AFP/Yahoo! News. "We know that the developed nations are using biological warfare, leaving guns to primitive people. They have the resources to do this," the Standard quoted Maathai as saying during a workshop on Aug. 30 in the central Kenyan town of Nyeri, according to AFP/Yahoo! News. "AIDS is not a curse from God to Africans or the black people. It is a tool to control them designed by some evil-minded scientists, but we may not know who particularly did," she added, according to the Standard, AFP/Yahoo! News reports (AFP/Yahoo! News, 10/9) Saturday, Maathai repeated her belief that HIV was deliberately "devised to destroy black people," according to Reuters. She added that her comments published in the Standard were "intended to promote an inquiring attitude" toward HIV/AIDS among Africans and "combat the fatalistic notion that it was a curse from God," Reuters reports. "Would you solve the problem if you believed it was a curse from God?" Maathai asked, adding that she was "encouraging people to ask questions." Although Maathai said she never indicated that a specific region or nation was responsible for creating HIV/AIDS, she is "suspicious" about the "secrecy surrounding the origin of the virus," according to Reuters. "Some people say it came from the monkeys, and I doubt it. ... But I say it cannot be that only black people are cursed because we are dying more than any other people on this planet, and that's a fact" (Kanina, Reuters, 10/9).
Originally posted by samhain
No, an African guy f***ed a monkey.It is peculiar how the people that used to get Aids/HIV en masse were gay, black or heroin addicts, does make it seem like the evil white guy weapon of choice.
Pretty much.
The people always condescending about conspiracy theory and proof are missing the point. Proof of government malfeasance is near IMPOSSIBLE to get. Most of the proof we have now is damning enough, yet was released voluntarily.
If you know the government is capable of, say, planning to bomb civilian centers of its own citizens to push a war against a foreign power, what does it matter that a sitting president rejected the idea? It should be enough that the possibility exists to arouse suspicion and mistrust.
Originally posted by cdtm
Pretty much.The people always condescending about conspiracy theory and proof are missing the point. Proof of government malfeasance is near IMPOSSIBLE to get. Most of the proof we have now is damning enough, yet was released [b]voluntarily
.If you know the government is capable of, say, planning to bomb civilian centers of its own citizens to push a war against a foreign power, what does it matter that a sitting president rejected the idea? It should be enough that the possibility exists to arouse suspicion and mistrust. [/B]
What does a sitting President have to do with anything?
I remember when Oliver North ran things all by himself.
Originally posted by No Bans
The lab theory seems more and more credible, China pressured the WHO to dismiss it, which they originally did, however in recent days the WHO has resumed its investigation into and speculates that a Wuhan scientist was infected. If Trump actually knew how to communicate instead of being like a man child the theory would have gained more steam. As of now the only people that don’t want the theory to be true is China and it’s sympathizers.
^ Supra/Time/Broly etc.
Re: Anybody remember the 80s and HIV was cooked up in a lab?
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Pepperidge farms remembers this now familiar viral conspiracy theory.Covid-19 conspiracy shit seems so familiar now. Doesn't it?
I remember, but we don't even have to go back to the 80's. iirc, early 2000s SARS was also claimed to have been created in a lab with the intent of being used as a biological weapon. I don't think that was every proven.
As I said from the start, I have no problem with the "it came from a lab" idea now, just prove it with logic and facts, not inane conspiracy rants.
Originally posted by Robtardyou have aids, yes you have aids.
I remember, but we don't even have to go back to the 80's. iirc, early 2000s SARS was also claimed to have been created in a lab with the intent of being used as a biological weapon. I don't think that was every proven.As I said from the start, I have no problem with the "it came from a lab" idea now, just prove it with logic and facts, not inane conspiracy rants.