Originally posted by cdtm
Money'd interests will protect money'd interests. I see no gain for the nay sayers here.If anything, they risk censor without any reward to compensate. Call them quacks but their sincerity is unquestionable.
Converselty there is much money for pharmaceutical vaccine owners.
You should post links to these credible pieces of research.
Originally posted by cdtmActually there is a ton of conservative money to be made from the nay-sayers.
Money'd interests will protect money'd interests. I see no gain for the nay sayers here.If anything, they risk censor without any reward to compensate. Call them quacks but their sincerity is unquestionable.
Converselty there is much money for pharmaceutical vaccine owners.
Also the logic you're using to defend the nay sayers is flawed because it can switched. There is no benefit for a pharmaceutical company to push a drug that will kill their consumers. Their business model is more built on people living long lives and using more of their product over time. And as mentioned above there is money to be made for the nay sayers.
So logically just trying to formulate motive isn't going to work that well. For instance for instance my logic is flawed because as pointed out there are many reasons why companies and people would say certain things.
That's why you have to work off the scientific consensus because it's really hard to game that many people.
Originally posted by NewjakAlso the logic you're using to defend the nay sayers is flawed because it can switched. There is no benefit for a pharmaceutical company to push a drug that will kill their consumers. Their business model is more built on people living long lives and using more of their product over time.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Dont agree about sincerity.I have an anti-Vaxx friend. Whenever I question his stance he just loses it.
Thats not being sincere. Its just being biased towards a certain stance.
And its arrogance that wont allow them to rethink and admit they are wrong. Hence, not sincere.
Heated partisanism has gotten pretty awful, I agree.
It's the scientists and academics I'm giving the benefit of the doubt to. They're putting their credibility on the line, and to any scientist that's essentially their career.
Not saying they're necessarily right, but they aren't the average troll without anything to gain except a giggle, and anything to lose except deplatforming.
Originally posted by cdtm
Heated partisanism has gotten pretty awful, I agree.It's the scientists and academics I'm giving the benefit of the doubt to. They're putting their credibility on the line, and to any scientist that's essentially their career.
Not saying they're necessarily right, but they aren't the average troll without anything to gain except a giggle, and anything to lose except deplatforming.
I just think human nature kicks in. As in peoples actions dont always make sense.
However Id be interested to know if anyone actually working on one of the vaccines spoke out against them. You know like a whistleblower type situation.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
@Rob: Your link does not refute anything she said just because you prefer your source over her, sorry.I'll stick with what she said, methinks. 😉
False. It shows that the vast majority of her peers and the medical and scientific communities do not agree with her claims
Originally posted by Robtard
Because it's fake news and she's largely alone in the ocean of doctors and scientist saying otherwise, that is why:“It is the vaccinated, NOT the unvaccinated, spreading mutant variants.”