Debate: Is there evidence for human evolution?

Kent Hovind takes on Jackson Roe on that very topic on SFT's youtube channel

https://youtu.be/giTZWx2GR6Q

Interesting debate.

Spoiler:

Spoiler:
Hovind wins... as he always does.

who is jackson roe

Originally posted by NewGuy01
who is jackson roe

Some atheist YouTuber. That's all I know about him.

If a monkey gave birth to a human, that would be a ****ing miracle.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Kent Hovind takes on Jackson Roe on that very topic on SFT's youtube channel

https://youtu.be/giTZWx2GR6Q

Interesting debate.

Spoiler:

Spoiler:
Hovind wins... as he always does.

🙂

No evidence found in Methneo's mirror so far.

Methneo believes God created him in 6 days... I believe him.

Originally posted by Blakemore
Methneo believes God created him in 6 days... I believe him.

Originally posted by samhain
No evidence found in Methneo's mirror so far.

You can't create something from nothing! The heavens and the Earth had to have been created by something! It didn't just happen in one sentence. And light, it couldn't have just magic out of nothing, there had to have been a cre-a-tor who said there would be light. Make sense?

I listened to it, and it was about what I expected.

Kent Hovind uses the classic creationist argument of "I don't see humans giving birth to other animals today. Or monkeys giving birth to fish... therefore evolution is wrong and you should convert to my religion." Then he cites the Bible as a scientific resource.

This guy unironically tried to say the geologic column is false because shuffling a deck of cards doesn't prove the cards are different ages. And he also argues that humans use to live to be 900 years old. He then goes on to advocate for home schooling, because public schools are brainwashing kids by teaching evolution.

It's no wonder he appeals to people like Star. He allows them to stick their fingers in their ears and ignore the science that makes them uncomfortable.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
who is jackson roe

These are the typical targets for people like Kent Hovind. He generally avoids debating actual scientists because he needs to maintain his image if he's to continue making money off of fundamentalist creationists like Star.

Originally posted by StyleTime
He's just some dude who is "into science." Not a scientist.

These are the typical targets for people like Kent Hovind. He generally avoids debating actual scientists because he needs to maintain his image if he's to continue making money off of fundamentalist creationists like Star.

Bingo.

Science is random molecules. That means that there had to be a creator. Learn your facts.

Oddly, that's not too far off from Hovind's argument.

Originally posted by Wonder Man
Science is random molecules. That means that there had to be a creator. Learn your facts.

Get your facts right, my friend.

Was Mr. Garrison from South Park modeled after Kent Hovind?

YouTube video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkpRrtHzlVs

Most evolutionists/atheists/old earthers Hovind debates have a lot more energy and fight in them as this poor guy did.

He claims at the end he had a lot of fun but he sure didn't loook like he was having fun throughout debate.

He was behaving as if debating Hovind was a real chore, not something that was fun.

Maybe he knew beforehand that he'd lose because he had seen Hovind annihilate everyone else he debates, who knows.

I honestly kinda felt sorry for the guy. Looked like he needed a shot of adrenaline lol.

Originally posted by Robtard
Was Mr. Garrison from South Park modeled after Kent Hovind?

YouTube video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkpRrtHzlVs

😂

That never gets old.. And I never thought about it, but you're right, it's totally a satire of Creationists like Hovind. Because animals spontaneously appearing makes the *most* sense!