Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://news.yahoo.com/uk-royal-marines-dominated-us-121424223.htmlUK Royal Marines dominated US Marines in a desert-battle simulation, prompting them to surrender less than halfway through, report says
I hate to think what would have happened of it had been the Para's who are better than the marines.
See how CRT has emasculated our once great men?
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Methneo, get over it. It's like how Tyson fury destroyed Deontay Wilder...
The last time Deontay Wilder won a fight
Originally posted by ilikecomics
This is what happens when you lower strength requirements to allow women.
The US Marines didn't lose a strength competition, you retard. They were simply outclassed in warfare by a better trained force.
There's also less than 60 female Marines out of 182,000 active personnel.
Originally posted by Robtard
The US Marines didn't lose a strength competition, you retard. They were simply outclassed in warfare by a better trained force.There's also less than 60 female Marines out of 182,000 active personnel.
Better trained and less regulatory shackles.
Patton needed to apologize for slapping a shell shockef soldier, the SAS commanders can get away with kicking you in the balls and no one makes them apologize to anyone.
Originally posted by Robtard
The US Marines didn't lose a strength competition, you retard. They were simply outclassed in warfare by a better trained force.There's also less than 60 female Marines out of 182,000 active personnel.
Marines have to carry 90-130 lbs, you don't think that'd make a difference between men and women ?
Originally posted by ilikecomics
On average, yes.
I'm sure there are female bodybuilders much stronger than me, but they're on the extreme end of the bell curve.
... and a whole heck of a lot more that are stronger than wittle blakey. 😂
...and a heck of a lot smarter too, especially in the science department. 😉
Originally posted by Blakemore
I don't think it's an all or nothing proposition.
The same way I don't think all blacks have lower IQ than all whites, but on average they do.
For example Thomas sowell is black and a genius, Gina Carano is a women and could probably bench double what I can.
Statistical reasoning is important.
Originally posted by ilikecomics
Marines have to carry 90-130 lbs, you don't think that'd make a difference between men and women ?
ThePointYouDodged: The US Marines lost this due to their skill level not being up to par to the Royal Marines. It had nothing to do with female Marines, of which there probably wasn't any in this exercise.
You incels really are a weird and confused lot
Originally posted by RobtardWell considering this reliable source,
ThePointYouDodged: The US Marines lost this due to their skill level not being up to par to the Royal Marines. It had nothing to do with female Marines, of which there probably wasn't any in this exercise.You incels really are a weird and confused lot
Originally posted by ilikecomicsit was probably because the U.S. had more black marines who on average have lower I.Q.'s than white people, so that may possibly be the reason because Americans are so nice to black people and the U.K. is racist by not letting enough black people into the marines... who may not perform as well because they're dumb...
I don't think it's an all or nothing proposition.
The same way I don't think all blacks have lower IQ than all whites, but on average they do.For example Thomas sowell is black and a genius, Gina Carano is a women and could probably bench double what I can.
Statistical reasoning is important.
Yeah, they're a weird and confused lot.
Of course the Royal Marines would easily beat the Marines. The two are not equivalent and to act as if they are "counterparts" simply because they are both called "marines" is hilariously disingenuous. The US Marines are an entire branch of the American military. By contrast, the UK Royal Marines are a small elite commando force. They are not equivalent. The Royal Marines are closer to Green Berets or SEALs than standard US Marines...