Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty

Started by cdtm43 pages

five men and seven women.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/11/16/us/consultant-jury-oj-simpson-working-in-rittenhouse-trial/index.html

CNN spins this as a good thing for the defense. Women are far more likely to vote against perceived vigilantism, so can't see this make up being good for team Rittenhouse.

Originally posted by cdtm
May as well lump yourself in with other rightist, I'm a leftist.

I say Center left, friends call me a radical leftie.

Where have we seen that tactic used before...

Originally posted by Robtard
Where have we seen that tactic used before...
Tim Pool, DDM and a million other far right loons.

Yup...

Originally posted by Robtard
Yup...

When did you lose your way? It's like you were talking sense one moment, then changed into a wingnut overnight.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Tim Pool, DDM and a million other far right loons.

I do not know if they are gaslighting trolls, or if they are actually stupid enough to think that anyone believes them.

Originally posted by cdtm
Here's the critical difference:

Rosenbaum was the one advancing on Kyle. Kyle was the one in retreat. Ergo, one was an aggressor, one was not.

But it really depends. A court may well find Rosenbaum reasonably defended himself, and reasonably thought Kyle was an active shooter he was performing a duty to nullify.

Both might be in the right, depending on circumstances.

If they were using melee weapons, sure... But with guns, you can absolutely fire whole backing away. Momentum of the person doesn't matter at all with ranged weapons. That doesn't determine defense versus offense.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I do not know if they are gaslighting trolls, or if they are actually stupid enough to think that anyone believes them.
👆To quote that meme you always used to post Adam, "can't they be both?". 😂

Originally posted by truejedi
If they were using melee weapons, sure... But with guns, you can absolutely fire whole backing away. Momentum of the person doesn't matter at all with ranged weapons. That doesn't determine defense versus offense.

Had Rittenhouse been brandishing his weapon and threatening people then Rosenbaum would have had a case for self defense. But, as far as I'm aware, that was not the case.

Originally posted by ares834
Had Rittenhouse been brandishing his weapon and threatening people then Rosenbaum would have had a case for self defense. But, as far as I'm aware, that was not the case.
Their are videos of him strutting round and pointing his gun at people.

I've only seen him strutting around. I've not seen him actually brandishing his weapon. Though, if he did, that would give Rosenbaum a possible reason to believe his life may have been in danger.

Originally posted by cdtm
https://www.google.com/amp/s/abc7chicago.com/amp/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-joseph-rosenbaum-kenosha/11242392/

No amount of provocation justifies what Rosembaum did. His killing was a consequence of his own actions.

Yup.

Originally posted by truejedi
If they were using melee weapons, sure... But with guns, you can absolutely fire whole backing away. Momentum of the person doesn't matter at all with ranged weapons. That doesn't determine defense versus offense.

If a cut and dry confrontation, perhaps.

Rosenbaum sat in ambush though. He could have easily avoided Rittenhouse all together. There was no reason to make it a fight or flight scenerio.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Their are videos of him strutting round and pointing his gun at people.

I'm sure it was "peacefully" pointing his gun at people.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm sure it was "peacefully" pointing his gun at people.

A fiery but mostly peaceful display of 2nd amendment rights.

Any way you argue it, they died for nothing.

I really do wonder why they tried to fight him. Probably thought he was a beta cuck who didn't have what it took to pull the trigger, and wanted to **** him up.

Any puss-puss can pull a trigger. eg all the pussies who go on shooting rampages because they can't get laid. Punisher LARPers. Jihadist.

Originally posted by Robtard
Any puss-puss can pull a trigger. eg all the pussies who go on shooting rampages because they can't get laid. Punisher LARPers. Jihadist.
That's true.

Originally posted by Robtard
Any puss-puss can pull a trigger. eg all the pussies who go on shooting rampages because they can't get laid. Punisher LARPers. Jihadist.
Yup! So true. It's like Surt said if I ever laid a finger on him he would shoot me. Methneo would be the same no doubt.

Punisher larpers in the making.

Originally posted by Robtard
Any puss-puss can pull a trigger. eg all the pussies who go on shooting rampages because they can't get laid. Punisher LARPers. Jihadist.

Pretty much agree with this.

I know some people do react in anger even if they see someone with a knife or gun. I absolutely can't understand such a reaction.

Fear should trump anger any day, imo.