Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty

And those people are talking form ignorance. I'm certainly going to put far more faith in a judge than some internet pundits.

Originally posted by ares834
And those people are talking form ignorance. I'm certainly going to put far more faith in a judge than some internet pundits.

Or some Leftist on an obscure Internet forum.

Of course you are, you believe Rittenhouse is innocent of all crimes.

Based on all evidence presented, yes. I think almost anyone could come to that conclusion. The only real issue was whether there were some unknown intricacies to the law and that doesn't seem to be the case.

Originally posted by Robtard
And of course the defense is asking for a 'mistrial with prejudice', that favors their client. You'd think a case with a claimed "almost no case" wouldn't need that.

Why wouldn't they? It's a guaranteed win if they get it rather than relying on the jury.

I'm agreeing it's legally a smart move. But also shows a lack of faith in their own defense case.

Not really. Even if they thought their case was open and shut, it would be better to go for the dismissal with prejudice. I hope they don't get it. But we'll see.

But it does.

Rittenhouse being found not guilty would be the most ideal outcome for the defense and Rittenhouse.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's disingenuous. People have been talking about the judge's very selective dismissal of the evidence that doesn't favor Rittenhouse from the start, before the trial started.

And of course the defense is asking for a 'mistrial with prejudice', that favors their client. You'd think a case with a claimed "almost no case" wouldn't need that.

I disagree. Yes, Kyle being found not guilty would be better but, if I were him, I go with the sure thing every time. Even if they were 99% certain they would win, I'd still try for the mistrial.

I still would like to know why an audio recording of Rittenhouse professing a desire to shoot people with his AR rifle days before he shot and killed people with his AR rifle was not allowed.

Audio recordings of the accused have been used against the accused plenty of times.

Originally posted by ares834
I disagree. Yes, Kyle being found not guilty would be better but, if I were him, I go with the sure thing every time. Even if they were 99% certain they would win, I'd still try for the mistrial.

Fair enough. As I said, legally it's the smart move, even if dirty. Just looks bad, especially in a case of this notoriety.

Originally posted by ares834
Based on all evidence presented, yes. I think almost anyone could come to that conclusion. .

Pot

Kettle

YouTube video

Saucepan

Bucket

Vagina

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
And therein lies the problem of the judge.

I'm assuming you are talking about the video the judge deemed inadmissible. That video is propensity evidence and, from what I understand, it is generally not admissible in court.

The people who believe Rittenhouse to be innocent should be the ones asking why the audio evidence and such was dismissed.