Covid 19 discussion

Started by Newjak3 pages

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Even doctors at Pfizer admit that natural immunity is better. Too bad they had to be caught on camera secretly instead of saying that to the public.

I imagine that would interfere with the billions of dollars Pfizer made.

Sweden literally tried this. During that time they had a higher death per capita rate then their neighbors.

It's still better to get the vaccine while we as a species give ourselves time to let our bodies get used to covid being around.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Even doctors at Pfizer admit that natural immunity is better. Too bad they had to be caught on camera secretly instead of saying that to the public.

I imagine that would interfere with the billions of dollars Pfizer made.

Tell that to Glenn Beck.

Originally posted by Newjak
Sweden literally tried this. During that time they had a higher death per capita rate then their neighbors.

It's still better to get the vaccine while we as a species give ourselves time to let our bodies get used to covid being around.

How do you explain uttar Pradesh (population 225 million) wiping out covid without vaccination ?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Tell that to Glenn Beck.

Lmao Glenn Beck is a fatass

Originally posted by ilikecomics
How do you explain uttar Pradesh (population 225 million) wiping out covid without vaccination ?

You haven't been keeping up with India's covid infection stats, have you?

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Hence why I don't like that the mRNA gene therapy grants narrow immunity, at the expense of more robust natural immunity.

You're confusing immunity with resistance.

Originally posted by samhain
You're confusing immunity with resistance.

Explain like I'm 5.
What's the difference between immunity and resistance ?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
You haven't been keeping up with India's covid infection stats, have you?

Uttar Pradesh has around 70-80k cases, much lower than other places with similar populations.

And of course they're catching omicron, the sources I followed predicted that strains would become more and more vax immune, spread further, with less serious side effects. Which is what is happening.

So not "wiping out covid" then?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
So not "wiping out covid" then?

Previous to the vax accelerated omicron variant, yes actually.

Why? Because they had extremely low infection and death rates?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Why? Because they had extremely low infection and death rates?

Correct, due to early prevention via therapeutics like ivermectin.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/uttar-pradesh-government-says-early-use-of-ivermectin-helped-to-keep-positivity-deaths-low/ar-BB1gDp5U

"Uttar Pradesh was the first state in the country to introduce large-scale prophylactic and therapeutic use of Ivermectin. In May-June 2020, a team at Agra, led by Dr Anshul Pareek, administered Ivermectin to all RRT team members in the district on an experimental basis. It was observed that none of them developed Covid-19 despite being in daily contact with patients who had tested positive for the virus,” Uttar Pradesh State Surveillance Officer Vikssendu Agrawal said...
timely introduction of Ivermectin since the first wave has helped the state maintain a relatively low positivity rate despite its high population density, he said, “Despite being the state with the largest population base and a high population density, we have maintained a relatively low positivity rate and cases per million of population”

Massive leap of conjecture alert. Plenty medical workers across the world who haven't used ivermectin and yet have had daily contact with covid positive patients have never been infected.

Plenty of other countries that didn't use ivermectin got down to extremely low infection and death rates...and now have extremely high infection rates. So we'll keep an eye on Uttar Pradesh and see what happens with theirs in the coming weeks. See how their death rate compares with vaccinated countries.

For the record, I've previously posted studies showing how ivermectin can help reduce viral load and clear covid from positive cases more quickly.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Lmao Glenn Beck is a fatass

Totally irrelevant. He got COVID twice. His "superior" natural immunity from getting COVID the first time did not protect him from getting it a second time. And this time around, it is worse, and it is in his lungs. But tell us more about how natural immunity is better than a vaccine, when the vaccine does not require one to actually contract and survive the disease.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Massive leap of conjecture alert. Plenty medical workers across the world who haven't used ivermectin and yet have had daily contact with covid positive patients have never been infected.

Plenty of other countries that didn't use ivermectin got down to extremely low infection and death rates...and now have extremely high infection rates. So we'll keep an eye on Uttar Pradesh and see what happens with theirs in the coming weeks. See how their death rate compares with vaccinated countries.

For the record, I've previously posted studies showing how ivermectin can help reduce viral load and clear covid from positive cases more quickly.

So if you're aware of the efficacy of ivermectin, how do you feel about the mainstream media calling it horse paste and obscuring the fact that it's a cheap, effective, Nobel prize winning medicine ?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Totally irrelevant. He got COVID twice. His "superior" natural immunity from getting COVID the first time did not protect him from getting it a second time. And this time around, it is worse, and it is in his lungs. But tell us more about how natural immunity is better than a vaccine, when the vaccine does not require one to actually contract and survive the disease.

Obesity is one of the main risk factors. The obese even spread it faster.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
So if you're aware of the efficacy of ivermectin, how do you feel about the mainstream media calling it horse paste and obscuring the fact that it's a cheap, effective, Nobel prize winning medicine ?

The same way I feel about those who ignore the even higher efficacy, even lower side effects and even lower drug interaction issues of the vaccines.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
The same way I feel about those who ignore the even higher efficacy, even lower side effects and even lower drug interaction issues of the vaccines.

So intentionally misrepresented statistics, which would be a foundational underpinning to the pro vaxx argument, isn't graded with a heavier weight than the opinion that trusting conclusions based on flase premises isnt rational ?

You'll have to clarify what you mean by misrepresented statistics.

Well actually you won't because I already know you're going to rehash your same obliterated nonsense from our previous discussions because nothing ever gets through.