Does anyone agree with this article on Black Adam?

Started by abhilegend3 pages

Originally posted by Stoic
Abhi, is Black Adam stronger than the Hulk?

Doesn't need to be to beat him.
Originally posted by Stoic
Is that canon?

Its not.

Thanks for the info Pr, and Abhi. I did a search on Kona Lar, Yeti, and Screamer and got nothing resembling those characters in the book. I'm not 100% sure, but the comic was 13 pages long. I'm guessing that those 2 reasons alone invalidate the books canon? As I said though, I'm not 100% sure though?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Doesn't need to be to beat him.
Its not.

Least it wasn't a dream he was trying to pass off as reality.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Doesn't need to be to beat him.
Its not.

You have to remember that this is a forum battle. The Hulk is being used like all other characters in forum matches at full capacity. Use of low showings show holes in what otherwise may be perceived as an invincible opponent to the unwary, or misinformed debater. What I've learned (which should be clearly obvious to most), is that these low showings may at times be due to weakness exploitation, and should be treated as such.

In this debate, there are clearly 3 characters that could upset Black Adam's so called reign over Marvel's High Herald plus tier.

If evidence exists that proves that a character can defend against assaults such as; blitz attacks due to simply being fast enough (reactive speed or otherwise); resist, or survive magical attacks even though they are vulnerable to magic, based upon their constitution, absorb finite, or unknown amounts of radiant energy etc. We know that there is a possibility for them to compete against characters that may be capable of launching many of those attacks.

At full capacity, I do not believe that Black Adam would be able to defeat the Hulk, especially not on neutral ground.