Convoy of truckers drive on Canadian capital to oppose vaccine mandates

Started by Old Man Whirly!12 pages

Originally posted by cdtm
And did you blm simps think the "peaceful protests' should be shut down for noise? You think people didn't have trouble sleeping with all the marching and vandalism?

As for Canada, they've had their own protests.

Why single out this protest for police action? The product transport professionals have the same right of protest as anyone else.

durpalm

Originally posted by cdtm
And did you blm simps think the "peaceful protests' should be shut down for noise? You think people didn't have trouble sleeping with all the marching and vandalism?

As for Canada, they've had their own protests.

Why single out this protest for police action? The product transport professionals have the same right of protest as anyone else.

Actually, its part of criminal code.

https://www.ottawapolice.ca/en/safety-and-crime-prevention/Demonstators.aspx

blocking or obstructing a highway (Section 423(1)(g))
causing a disturbance (Section 175)
common nuisance (Section 180)
interfering with transportation facilities (Section 248)
breach of the peace or imminent breach (Section 31)
offensive volatile substance (Section 178)
riots (Sections 32, 33, 64, 65, 67, 68, 69)
unlawful assembly (Section 63)
mischief (Section 430)

And....requires a permit. Just like every other protest in Ottawa.

And I believe they did none of that....

Just follow what is happening with Indigenous protests in BC.....much more violent police action.

YouTube video

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
incredibly salty it's the yeast run off from brewing beer processed with msg. It is the food of the gods, it works so well with cheese and very well with paprika.
it also has beef flavourings like McDonald's fries...

Originally posted by Smasandian
Actually, its part of criminal code.

https://www.ottawapolice.ca/en/safety-and-crime-prevention/Demonstators.aspx

blocking or obstructing a highway (Section 423(1)(g))
causing a disturbance (Section 175)
common nuisance (Section 180)
interfering with transportation facilities (Section 248)
breach of the peace or imminent breach (Section 31)
offensive volatile substance (Section 178)
riots (Sections 32, 33, 64, 65, 67, 68, 69)
unlawful assembly (Section 63)
mischief (Section 430)

And....requires a permit. Just like every other protest in Ottawa.

And I believe they did none of that....

Just follow what is happening with Indigenous protests in BC.....much more violent police action.

Needing government approval to protest the government?

Nothing to see here.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE

For the right of passive resistance against tyranny? Very deeply do I care.

Originally posted by cdtm
Needing government approval to protest the government?

Nothing to see here.

The wrong government you mean?

People protest all the time in Ottawa...all the time. They protest government buildings, the protest the US embassy (common occurrence in 2010's), the protest other embassies. It happens all the time.

You get a free permit and then you can protest. Nobody stops you.
And they are not stopping this one.....

In June 2020, over 20 thousand people protested for anti-racism. Didn't see anything like this. It was allowed, they came, and left.

But of course, if this was a black lives matter/racism protest that acted like that...I'm sure all those ****ers would say the same thing (it's ok to cause a nuisance to everybody who lives there".

Originally posted by cdtm
For the right of passive resistance against tyranny? Very deeply do I care.

That'll be why you always vehemently defended "taking the knee".

...

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
That'll be why you always vehemently defended "taking the knee".

...

to use earlyv00's vernacular, "Cdtm is owned again".

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
That'll be why you always vehemently defended "taking the knee".

...

I also defend the right of the Westboro Baptist Church. That doesn't mean I condone them.

And the knee had nothing to do with blm. Lets call a spade a spade; they intentionally targeted Republicans, because they know Republicans tend to be more patriotic then Democrats. It doesn't draw attention to a cause, it's simply disrespectful to veterans and the Right.

Never seen anyone owned as hard as cdtm by Jaden 2.0 in this thread. Ouch!

Then you need your eyes checked.

If I'm not mistaken....but were veterans offended by taking the knee? Or were they used as a convenient excuse?

Using your words exactly.

"And the knee had nothing to do with blm. Lets call a spade a spade; they intentionally targeted Republicans, because they know Republicans tend to be more patriotic then Democrats. It doesn't draw attention to a cause, it's simply disrespectful to veterans and the Right."

Had noting to do? Check...Canadian Federal government has nothing to do with what they are protesting.

intentionally targeted Republicans? Check....well...a lot of anti-Trudeau flags going on there.

It doesn't draw attention to a cause, it's simply disrespectful to veterans and the Right? Check...it doesn't because wrong city, wrong government and its disrespectful to all people who live in that downtown core.

So..using your own logic means you think this truck convoy is bullshit...not about fighting against the tryanny of a provincial governments decision in a federal town.

Originally posted by cdtm
I also defend the right of the Westboro Baptist Church. That doesn't mean I condone them.

And the knee had nothing to do with blm. Lets call a spade a spade; they intentionally targeted Republicans, because they know Republicans tend to be more patriotic then Democrats. It doesn't draw attention to a cause, it's simply disrespectful to veterans and the Right.

THOSE VETERANS DIED SO PEOPLE WHO PLAY FOOTBALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH SO THEY SHOULD SHUT UP AND SHOW RESPECT!

Originally posted by Smasandian
If I'm not mistaken....but were veterans offended by taking the knee? Or were they used as a convenient excuse?

Using your words exactly.

"And the knee had nothing to do with blm. Lets call a spade a spade; they intentionally targeted Republicans, because they know Republicans tend to be more patriotic then Democrats. It doesn't draw attention to a cause, it's simply disrespectful to veterans and the Right."

Had noting to do? Check...Canadian Federal government has nothing to do with what they are protesting.

intentionally targeted Republicans? Check....well...a lot of anti-Trudeau flags going on there.

It doesn't draw attention to a cause, it's simply disrespectful to veterans and the Right? Check...it doesn't because wrong city, wrong government and its disrespectful to all people who live in that downtown core.

So..using your own logic means you think this truck convoy is bullshit...not about fighting against the tryanny of a provincial governments decision in a federal town.

Is the left against Trucking?

Lets not pretend you aren't aware of the perception about how the military leans Right. It's been a thing since burning flags to push buttons.

If you want to ruffle Republicans, you attack patriotism. It's an underhanded tactic, it's disrespectful, and it's unnecessary.

But this is how petty leftist are. They hate the Right, and will never pass an opportunity to attack one.

Meanwhile, Tucker sticks up for leftist Whoopie Goldberg. Left wing pundits would be laughing and taunting. All they know is hate.

Wow, Cdtm keeps owning himself durpalm

haha...whatever.

Super-patriotism is supporting the government no matter what the government does, like the Iraq war, for example.

Truckolds bothering the Canadian capital because they don't wanna take their medicine is just silly.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Wow, Cdtm keeps owning himself durpalm

What a ****ing clown.