Just listen to the video.
Yes, this is Project Veritas. The words speak for themselves.
If you feel this misses context, please elaborate what possible context could justify this.
Just listen to the video.
Yes, this is Project Veritas. The words speak for themselves.
If you feel this misses context, please elaborate what possible context could justify this.
Re: Just listen to the video.
Originally posted by cdtm
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/astrazeneca-source-recording-from-2020-shows-ceo-pascal-soriot-saying/Yes, this is Project Veritas. The words speak for themselves.
If you feel this misses context, please elaborate what possible context could justify this.
“If the CEO of one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies realized back in 2020 that antibody treatments are necessary for the immunocompromised, why would governments around the world force vaccine mandates when millions of people are at risk if they get it?”
Disingenuous extrapolation alert.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Disingenuous extrapolation alert.
What about his words though? The promise of antibodies, the dangers of immune compromised people getting vaccines?
We literally have a US politician claiming market collapse is worse then death. Governments have a history of doing worse with less inventive then allowing an unacceptable vaccine linked death rate to save the global economy.
"Collateral damage" and "US interests" were common speak in Iraq.
Originally posted by cdtm
What about his words though? The promise of antibodies, the dangers of immune compromised people getting vaccines?We literally have a US politician claiming market collapse is worse then death. Governments have a history of doing worse with less inventive then allowing an unacceptable vaccine linked death rate to save the global economy.
"Collateral damage" and "US interests" were common speak in Iraq.
He doesn't say its dangerous for immune compromised people to get vaccinated. That's where the disingenuous extrapolation is. He says they can't be vaccinated. Not that it's dangerous if they do get it.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
He doesn't say its dangerous for immune compromised people to get vaccinated. That's where the disingenuous extrapolation is. He says they can't be vaccinated. Not that it's dangerous if they do get it.
Why else would they not be able to get a vaccine, except that a vaccine was dangerous for their condition.
And what of the long lasting antibody alternate? He never said they can't be immunized because they are compromised, he offered an alternative to vaccines.
Originally posted by cdtmdurpoop Embarrassing
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/astrazeneca-source-recording-from-2020-shows-ceo-pascal-soriot-saying/Yes, this is Project Veritas. The words speak for themselves.
If you feel this misses context, please elaborate what possible context could justify this.