Originally posted by Nichole
Go to a hospital, and ask to see a victim of digital rape, then come back here and tell me what digital rape is. You lot asked, so I told you, and it seems you are all as insensitive as each other. Digital rape is NOT sexual assult, it's rape, plain and simple.
Why don't you say rape then?Instead of calling it digital rape?jm
Originally posted by Nichole
Go to a hospital, and ask to see a victim of digital rape, then come back here and tell me what digital rape is. You lot asked, so I told you, and it seems you are all as insensitive as each other. Digital rape is NOT sexual assult, it's rape, plain and simple.
Since this answer is absolutely crystal-clear as to what digital rape is, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that digital rape is the thing that happens in to those ditzes in one of those USA Network Cyber Virtual Reality Horror Movies with a title like, "Take A Byte Out of You." Whatever that is.
Originally posted by dani_california
like i said before its not a woman's fault or mistake if she gets raped.
The percentage of women who have abortions due to rape or incest is like 11% or 1 in 10.
Most pro-life people don't consider that a woman should keep the baby in those cases anyway.
So back on topic....
Should we pay for the murder of a child that two people knew might be created while having sex?
Originally posted by sithsaber408
The percentage of women who have abortions due to rape or incest is like 11% or 1 in 10.Most pro-life people don't consider that a woman should keep the baby in those cases anyway.
So back on topic....
Should we pay for the murder of a child that two people knew might be created while having sex?
But still not allowing those one in ten the choice is completely unfair.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Should we pay for the murder of a child that two people knew might be created while having sex?
I disagree with your verbage which is specifcally meant to arouse emotional responses however WE shouldn't have to pay (in other words fund) the abortion for those who simply wish to have the option of having one.
Originally posted by dani_california
But still not allowing those one in ten the choice is completely unfair.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Most pro-life people don't consider that a woman should keep the baby in those cases anyway.
But while we're at it, not allowing the baby a choice in its life is also unfair. It didn't ask to be the product of rape or incest, but there he or she is, alive and well.
Originally posted by SoleranI certainly hope it arouses some sort of emotion out of you, rather than some cold, calculating financial opinion that tax dollars could be better spent.
I disagree with your verbage which is specifcally meant to arouse emotional responses however WE shouldn't have to pay (in other words fund) the abortion for those who simply wish to have the option of having one.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
I certainly hope it arouses some sort of emotion out of you, rather than some cold, calculating financial opinion that tax dollars could be better spent.
Yeah it does, it tells me that people that specifically using a rally cry typically look to employ more to their ranks without educating to BOTH sides effectively.
Tax dollars can also be better spent elsewhere.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
I certainly hope it arouses some sort of emotion out of you, rather than some cold, calculating financial opinion that tax dollars could be better spent.
Well for those of you who live in America you don't have to pay for it, no public health care system, remember? Women have to pay for it themselves, so stop bitching.
Originally posted by botankus
Since this answer is absolutely crystal-clear as to what digital rape is, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that digital rape is the thing that happens in to those ditzes in one of those USA Network Cyber Virtual Reality Horror Movies with a title like, "Take A Byte Out of You." Whatever that is.
http://www.uplink.com.au/lawlibrary/Documents/Docs/Doc28.html
Originally posted by sithsaber408
The percentage of women who have abortions due to rape or incest is like 11% or 1 in 10.Most pro-life people don't consider that a woman should keep the baby in those cases anyway.
So back on topic....
Should we pay for the murder of a child that two people knew might be created while having sex?
Originally posted by sithsaber40890% of abortions occur before 12 weeks gestation.
But while we're at it, not allowing the baby a choice in its life is also unfair. It didn't ask to be the product of rape or incest, but there he or she is, alive and well. I certainly hope it arouses some sort of emotion out of you, rather than some cold, calculating financial opinion that tax dollars could be better spent.
50% of fertilized zygotes are spontaneously aborted before a woman even knows she's pregnant.
Ask your religion-based inaccurate leading strawman question to someone who cares.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
But while we're at it, not allowing the baby a choice in its life is also unfair. It didn't ask to be the product of rape or incest, but
Thank you for illustrating your total lack of understanding. Nothing further from you is required.
Kill it, like the plaguge it is....
All joking aside, you'd ascribe "life" to a slug. So, you no longer have a point.