Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
All abortions are wrong.And if they are ban then no one would be able to kill a baby anymore.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/453391_1-mother-microwaves-baby
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/451812_1-father-microwaves-his-baby
Neither of them had an abortion. Are those cases of infanticide condoned by god? doped
Originally posted by Alpha Centauriit's interesting because I indeed have not seen this view from you. it's interesting because you learn something new about someone every day.
What? Do you not keep up? I've been saying that forever, it's always been a part of my stance. By frivolous I mean using it as birth control.Whilst that's not cool, it's still not my business and no reason to ban it.
-AC
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
All abortions are wrong.And if they are ban then no one would be able to kill a baby anymore.The world will be alot better if there were no more abortions allowed!jm
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
it's interesting because I indeed have not seen this view from you. it's interesting because you learn something new about someone every day.
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
All abortions are wrong.And if they are ban then no one would be able to kill a baby anymore.The world will be alot better if there were no more abortions allowed!jm
If banning things kept them from happening, the word "illegal" would not exist.
More women would die due to unsafe abortion. I don't know what that would cause, but our future-expert here might do.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
it's interesting because I indeed have not seen this view from you. it's interesting because you learn something new about someone every day.
I've expressed it since I first involved myself in this thread, including my replies to you.
You either ignore my posts or don't read them at all, or properly.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Since you asked me a question, I'll answer respectfully:No, no difference. It's still aborting either cells or a foetus. Means nothing to me.
-AC
As I assumed.
Ive said it beofore, and I think its a very important question for the arugement either way- pro-choice or pro-life: Is a human only a human once it is ejected from the birth canal? What is the difference between a material child, just born, umbilical cord cut and kid in hand -and a child aborted several days before birth (Which I know rarely happens, but it is very important anyways).
Originally posted by FeceMan
The issue isn't her having tons of abortions, it's that she's having an abortion for the wrong reasons. She had sex--she knew the risks, but she decided that the pleasure was worth those risks.
and what are the "right" reasons? you cant slip in your own moral standard as cannon for reality. as someone who shares an opinion with almost half your american peers you are certainly justified in adhering to your own moral standard, but in no way justified to hurl those morals intrusively and destructively on the shoulders of the other half.
Originally posted by The Black Ghost
As I assumed.Ive said it beofore, and I think its a very important question for the arugement either way- pro-choice or pro-life: Is a human only a human once it is ejected from the birth canal? What is the difference between a material child, just born, umbilical cord cut and kid in hand -and a child aborted several days before birth (Which I know rarely happens, but it is very important anyways).
I think you're confusing people saying there is no difference between organisms, and not caring what the difference is.
If someone could prove, scientifically, than a foetus becomes technically a human being, in the womb (Ha, good luck.), I'd concede it is one. It still wouldn't matter to me, it's still up to the woman.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
"Wrong" reasons would be subjective.-AC
Of course there subjective I doubt anyone's arguing that. But, Society/Common Law are founded by what people believe is Good and Bad. There is no such thing as a society where people are allowed to do as they please, that's just anarchy.
The Society I live in would never should not support abortion because it goes against our morals.
Oh, FYI, you need power to live how you want and impose or defend your will fom people who disagree.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Of course there subjective I doubt anyone's arguing that. But, Society/Common Law are founded by what people believe is Good and Bad. There is no such thing as a society where people are allowed to do as they please, that's just anarchy.
The Society I live in would never should not support abortion because it goes against our morals.Oh, FYI, you need power to live how you want and impose or defend your will fom people who disagree.
Would never should not? Sounds to me like you typed "Would never...", realised it is actually opposite to how you want, and just said should not.
If you think it shouldn't, fine. In the society I live in, it's deemed as the woman's choice. Has been, is, will probably remain.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Would never should not? Sounds to me like you typed "Would never...", realised it is actually opposite to how you want, and just said should not.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
If you think it shouldn't, fine. In the society I live in, it's deemed as the woman's choice. Has been, is, will probably remain.-AC
No, point in arguing about then, just a difference in lifestyle. 🙂