Abortion

Started by ADarksideJedi787 pages

The fetus has a soul as soon as the woman knows she is pregent.So there fore it is alive.I have no idea why Pro-abortion thinks it is not.Maybe because they know it is alive and don't want to admit that abortion does kill a baby who has no faults and has started the begining of live but is stopped.jm

JM is what a foetus could potentially become.

-AC

You did not answear my question so I am not answearing yours.Also call me Jackie!Thank you!jm

You didn't ask one that has any merit, I didn't ask one at all.

-AC

I did too ask a question.I said how can people who believe in abortion not think that a fetus is not alive and not breathing.jm

A fetus isn't breathing because it's surrounded by amniotic fluid and receives mixed oxygenated blood from the placenta, and excretes via the placenta.

It is alive and for all we know it could be breathing.People don't want us to believe it is breathing or all of us would know when we abort it.It is murdering a human being.jm

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
It is alive and for all we know it could be breathing.People don't want us to believe it is breathing or all of us would know when we abort it.It is murdering a human being.jm
You're an idiot.

I see you are calling me that because you can't think of a respond back to me.It is strange how pro-abortion people insult others when they can't think of a respond.
It is pretty funny!Got to go!Bye!jm 😆

Wait, "...for all we know."?

We know it's not breathing.

What the hell are you?

-AC

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
I see you are calling me that because you can't think of a respond back to me.It is strange how pro-abortion people insult others when they can't think of a respond.
It is pretty funny!Got to go!Bye!jm 😆
No you're actually an idiot. It's a statement of observation. There was no need to respond to your idiotic statement about how fetuses "could be breathing" without fully developed lungs, lacking surfactant and surrounded by amniotic fluid, receiving oxygen and expelling carbon dioxide and other waste products via the umbilical blood supply.

[QUOTE=]Originally posted by FeceMan

Yes, yes, that kind of phrase keeps being said, but I maintain that telling me I can't impose my morals onto anyone else is imposing your own morals on me.
[/QUOTE]

Just to be fair...you got a point there.
Bu to go on...you are still a moron.

Haha, I am a poet. A rather bad one of course. But still.

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
It is alive and for all we know it could be breathing.People don't want us to believe it is breathing or all of us would know when we abort it.It is murdering a human being.jm
Reading this post made me wish I was aborted.... 😐

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
Also call me Jackie!Thank you!jm

maybe you should sign your posts 'jackie' then, to avoid confusion...?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
See, "it is a potential human being already." At the moment of conception, it is a potential human being. By being a potential human being, it has a future. there are many possible futures for it. abortion. adoption. death at age 5. death by old age. It deserves the chance to live it's life, whether it is a wasted life or a great life.

Males: No masturbation, and no wet dreams.
Females: Do not go through your period.

Both have the potential to be life.

"If there was a machine that could turn rocks into babies..."

Originally posted by jollyjim311
Males: No masturbation, and no wet dreams.
Females: Do not go through your period.

Both have the potential to be life.

"If there was a machine that could turn rocks into babies..."


Yeah, that argument gets old. Alert me to when a sperm or ovum will spontaneously develop into a human being and then we'll talk.

Originally posted by FeceMan
The baby is going to die no matter what and/or the woman is in danger from the pregnancy.

dont be that guy. the one that quotes everything but the point.

Originally posted by Schecter
as someone who shares an opinion with almost half your american peers you are certainly justified in adhering to your own moral standard, but in no way justified to hurl those morals intrusively and destructively on the shoulders of the other half.
Originally posted by FeceMan
Yes, yes, that kind of phrase keeps being said, but I maintain that telling me I can't impose my morals onto anyone else is imposing your own morals on me.

i maintain that this is completely flawed logic, to imply that half the population is oppressive for not allowing the other half to oppress them.

dont be that guy

:edit: anyway

Originally posted by FeceMan

The fact is, the point of being pro-life is to protect life. If the baby is going to die from some kind of genetic defect, the life cannot be protected. If the mother is in danger from having birth, one cannot justify protecting one life while endangering another.

it is your belief that the moment of conception = life. another significant majority of the population disagrees.

Originally posted by Schecter
i maintain that this is completely flawed logic, to imply that half the population is oppressive for not allowing the other half to oppress them.

TOLERANCE
it is your belief that the moment of conception = life. another significant majority of the population disagrees.

I don't care. I'm more than willing to force what I believe on to others in situations like this, where the life of another is threatened.

Why do you care about my womb? What does my fetus have to do with you? What do you want from my baby? What kind of a sicko are you? Mind your own bloody business.

Originally posted by FeceMan
TOLERANCE

tolerance? what if 50% of the population decided that killing animals=illegal because its immoral. no longer can you eat meat of any kind in the u.s. i guess if you dont submit to this you are intollerant?

Originally posted by FeceMan
I don't care. I'm more than willing to force what I believe on to others in situations like this, where the life of another is threatened.

wow....logic...politics...you dont care. "fuk em." so then why discuss it?