OMW
Old Man Whirly!
Restricted
How Politicians divide and conquer
https://bigthink.com/the-present/politics-2637000462/
BILL EDDY: So high-conflict politicians — or what I call "wannabe kings"— because that's really what they want. They want to take over and eliminate opposition. How they effectively gain power in an election — and we're not talking about people that just became dictators from a war or something. We're talking about people getting elected. And what happens is they put out all this emotional message — all these emotional words. And these emotional words tend to trigger people into four different groups.
The whole article is pretty interesting.
Thoughts?
ROB
Re: How Politicians divide and conquer
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://bigthink.com/the-present/politics-2637000462/BILL EDDY: So high-conflict politicians — or what I call "wannabe kings"— because that's really what they want. They want to take over and eliminate opposition. How they effectively gain power in an election — and we're not talking about people that just became dictators from a war or something. We're talking about people getting elected. And what happens is they put out all this emotional message — all these emotional words. And these emotional words tend to trigger people into four different groups.
The whole article is pretty interesting.
Thoughts?
He broke it down very well with the four groups and how that helps someone without the majority support to still win, if they can play the game well enough.
-Loving Loyalist
-Riled up resisters
-Mild Moderates
-Disenchanted dropouts
CDT
Re: How Politicians divide and conquer
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://bigthink.com/the-present/politics-2637000462/BILL EDDY: So high-conflict politicians — or what I call "wannabe kings"— because that's really what they want. They want to take over and eliminate opposition. How they effectively gain power in an election — and we're not talking about people that just became dictators from a war or something. We're talking about people getting elected. And what happens is they put out all this emotional message — all these emotional words. And these emotional words tend to trigger people into four different groups.
The whole article is pretty interesting.
Thoughts?
Remember when Justin Trudeau told a jewish woman with holocaust survivor family that she was on the side of Nazi's when she called for reigning in the rhetorical alarmism against the Freedom Convoy?
What is that if not an emotional appeal? A disgusting one, that he should have known better then to play.