Originally posted by h1a8
We clearly see what the writer want us to think.
No, you see what you want to see. And make your own ridiculously biased conclusions. Not objective facts.
Originally posted by h1a8
What imagination? Everyone who saw the scene for the first time thought the same thing. Those bullets will phuck Thor up. Plain and simple. Correct. And that's why Thor can resist such bullets, because he has the feats to prove so. Onscreen >> writer's intent. Stop exaggerating. I mention writer's intent in less than 0.1% of all debates. Writer's intent goes when it doesn't contradict onscreen showings.
Your very biased imagination.
No they didn't. And even if they did, that doesn't make one bit of difference. Because it's just what they Thought. Not any kind of Objective fact.
You really don't seem to grasp the difference between Objective and Subjective analysis.
Nope, you bring it every time there's no evidence to back up your claims.
Originally posted by h1a8
Forum rules aren't logical fallacies.
Feats determine strength, not writers intent.
Forum rules are logical. Your arguments are full of logical fallcies. You can't use negative feats (i.e. he didn't do lift something ergo he can't).
It just means he's not displayed that level of strength yet.