i generally use it when someone melts down irrationally over something and cannot be reasoned with. i wasn't making up the part about zero propulsion or easy shoot-downs, it's been documented. so you're either 1-ignoring it because you're trolling, 2-denying the official reports because you're love scifi too much, or 3 haven't read up on it and assume that I'm the one trolling here. i could post sources/quotes if that's the case
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i generally use it when someone melts down irrationally over something and cannot be reasoned with. i wasn't making up the part about zero propulsion or easy shoot-downs, it's been documented. so you're either 1-ignoring it because you're trolling, 2-denying the official reports because you're love scifi too much, or 3 haven't read up on it and assume that I'm the one trolling here. i could post sources/quotes if that's the case
I mean, what are you reading? I've been reading network news and I just see "unidentified objects" over and over. Where are you getting tracked for days? No propulsion, etc. Most specifically about the one over Huron?
In fact, the air force specifically said they are not ruling out aliens.
Originally posted by truejedi
I mean, what are you reading? I've been reading network news and I just see "unidentified objects" over and over. Where are you getting tracked for days? No propulsion, etc. Most specifically about the one over Huron?
the second object was as i described, which also moved like the higher altitude balloon. if you want to believe that aliens traveled light years to float about on the same course a week after a chinese drone, have fun with that. you're totally right its aliens
Again:
"US Air Force General Glen VanHerck, who is responsible for the protection of US airspace, told reporters that the military had not been able to identify what the three most recent objects are, how they stay aloft, or where they are coming from.
"We're calling them objects, not balloons, for a reason,” said VanHerck, head of North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and Northern Command.
VanHerck said he would not rule out aliens or any other explanation."
There is plenty in there to suggest the last object is different in nature than the others. In fact, the article I posted specifically says the final three objects did not move at the same altitude or in the same way as the first.
I'm not saying it's aliens, im saying assuming it's a Chinese balloon based on what information we have been given isn't the right answer either. Why, again, we are shooting first and asking questions later is a little frustrating.
To me, that doesn't seem like reason enough to shoot them down.