Eternal Sunshine of Guy222's and Rao's Minds (v2.0)

Started by Parmaniac186 pages

YouTube video

Originally posted by -Pr-
So CDTM is still being a horrible bigot... at least some things don't change. Though they should.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW

Who is that next to Colossus? Surely not Psyloche?

That isn't a big boobed beauty, that's the spitting image of an androgynous angry feminizi. 😱

YouTube video

Pr is using a fake name on YouTube, I found him though.

Originally posted by -Pr-
So CDTM is still being a horrible bigot... at least some things don't change. Though they should.

It would be great if he did not shit up the thread with multiple back-to-back posts carrying in a conversation with himself.

I agree.

Someone should speak to MrMind about that.

Go watch fast x losers

Not getting a Google hit, is that a movie?

Originally posted by Gecko4lif
Go watch fast x losers

They took out a submarine with a car in 8 and went into space in a Pontiac Fiero in 9.

Do they race around inside an actively erupting volcano in this one?

Originally posted by cdtm
Not getting a Google hit, is that a movie?

Ohhhhh, the movies name is Fast X!

I was Google searching "Fast X Losers".

My bad.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW

I didn't sanction him. Nor do I approve of him. But if I ban him, who becomes the forum's next, most notorious bigot that should be banned. Who?

Who, I wonder...

Originally posted by cdtm
Who is that next to Colossus? Surely not Psyloche?

That isn't a big boobed beauty, that's the spitting image of an androgynous angry feminizi. 😱

It's Psylocke. Also, shut up. You probably hate her because she's asian anyway.

Originally posted by cdtm
I agree.

Someone should speak to MrMind about that.

We used to be able to ban people for that.

Originally posted by Astner
No. That was what you were implying, whether you intended it or not. Furthermore, I did address this point, you just chose to address that part of my reply the next part of your reply.

No. It doesn't place any burden on either the speaker or the hearer. Neither of them are allowed to enact violence, but that's enforced by law independently of whether or not something was said.

I'll not entertain your attempt to rewrite the conversation.

Enacting violence is not the same as inciting violence. But that's the distinction you're trying to poo-poo away when it comes to hate speech. I mean, can you explain the difference between assault and battery and why the law prohibits both?
Or are you goign to continue strawmanning?

Originally posted by Astner
The sentiment that the freedom of speech is it only held up by those who want to propagate intolerance is absurd.
Surely absurd. And a notion that nobody in this thread has ever endorsed. Let me know when you're done strawmanning to justify your own intolerance and are willing to discuss your own hypocrisies.

Originally posted by Robtard
They took out a submarine with a car in 8 and went into space in a Pontiac Fiero in 9.

Do they race around inside an actively erupting volcano in this one?

No they play rocket league with a nuke and a 10 year old kills highly trained government assassins

not joking

Originally posted by -Pr-
I didn't sanction him. Nor do I approve of him. But if I ban him, who becomes the forum's next, most notorious bigot that should be banned. Who?

Who, I wonder...

It's Psylocke. Also, shut up. You probably hate her because she's asian anyway.

We used to be able to ban people for that.

You can say that, but it's Marvel who turned her into a Japanese anime girl stereotype. 🤗

No one is more inclusive of Asians then I anyways, I support Asian Street Meat.

Originally posted by cdtm
But the point was not to justify Nazi Horrors, the point was to say why they did not spring up overnight. And social issues very much are a part of why they Rose to prominence. You forget that here in the west they were very much lauded as an ideal for a time.
I'm not uneducated when it comes to Nazi ideology. I have studied the historical context when the Nazi party rose to prominence. But my academical study doesn't cause me to handwave such ideology as a "natural, cultural human response due to economic circumstances." No, the exact opposite. And I'm not going to be a citizen in a country that let's that sh1t happen again. There are goddamned limits based on simple human decency.

And their rise to prominence is no justification for the immoral underpinnings of such ideology. Was there a reason why the Nazi party rose to dominance? Yeah, sure. Largely, because they were absolute pieces of sh1t that utilized hate-mongering, fear tactics, distorted history and violence to get their way.

So stop trying to see the "good reasons" or the "good things" that the Nazi party believed or accomplished. We saw what they were about when given free reign. Any attempt to handwave that away is a transparent attempt to reverse-justify inhuman bigotry.

Even Alex Jones isn't stupid enough to parrot this crap. Kanye-lite b1tch.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I didn't sanction him. Nor do I approve of him. But if I ban him, who becomes the forum's next, most notorious bigot that should be banned. Who?
Plenty of posters got nominations, bruh. No need to be hesitant over slippery slope worries, here.

Why do you keep accusing me of being an apologist when nothing I have said excuses anything about anything?

You're the one who made a claim tantamount to "The Nazi party exists because they are monsters, the end"

I was challenging that, nothing more.

Whatever, I didn't come into this looking for a fight and kind of ignored how heated things were getting on Astner.

Who btw is just calmly stating points and getting yelled at for it, so what did I THINK was gonna happen jumping at a claim about Nazi idealogy (Btw comparing modern day politics to Nazi's is kind of beneath you man. Even at their worst the alt-right ain't Nazi's and you know it.

And that will be my last "controversial" statement... Baki or Ippo talk from here on out)

Originally posted by cdtm
Well, the thing is Hitlers words wouldn't have amounted to much without the actual power to run the national interests. So lets say you're 100% right, then what? Do we censor politicians on the stump?

And there was a lot more at play then just his racist speeches, like the economy leading to a disgruntled receptive to a boogyman. IMO The Nazi thing has too many factors to say "See? Speech needs to be controlled".

=============

So the Nazi's are the good guys? Stumbles across a lunatic prospector?

=============

Lets just ignore the poverty, joblessness, miserable living conditions for many Germans, and how standards were raised across the board thanks to the Nationalist Party.

=============

I'm just against demonizing people without trying to at least understand what they're coming from.

=============

social issues very much are a part of why they Rose to prominence. You forget that here in the west they were very much lauded as an ideal for a time.

N1gga, there were too many results in a simple search by user where you used the term "Nazi" for even me to stomach going through.

Who knows what else would've been found if I ran new searches with words like "Hitler" or "Holocaust".

Originally posted by cdtm
And that will be my last "controversial" statement...

Thank you, good sir for respecting my delicate fee-fees. Such a hero.

No problem?

Seriously though, how else could I bow out without sounding like that? I mean I could just shut up I guess, but I have my pride too you know.

Just trying to not make things worse because this topic is a brush fire and I am apparently flint. And not GI Joe Flint (Did I mention I'm reading the IDW Collection? It's awesome.)