Namek and Faora vs the entire twilight verse

Started by h1a82 pages

Originally posted by tkitna
Was it Pattinsons or Stewarts awesome acting chops that sucked you in?

Those movies were enjoyable for 12 year olds. Thats about it.


Like I said, you are an idiot for not thinking it was a good movie. Facts.

I took my gf (then) to see the movie when it came out (she wanted to see it). I figured it was some sappy girl chick flick before seeing it. After watching it I was highly impressed. It became my favorite vampire movie (trumping interview with a vampire).

Look how popular it was. Common sense tells you that you are in the minority and the idiot.

Originally posted by tkitna
Was it Pattinsons or Stewarts awesome acting chops that sucked you in?

Those movies were enjoyable for 12 year olds. Thats about it.

TBF, Pattison post Twilight horrors has become a pretty good actor.

Stewart is still not very good, but she's better than she was during Twilight.

But yeah, cringe sauce all the way back then.

Originally posted by Robtard
TBF, Pattison post Twilight horrors has become a pretty good actor.

Stewart is still not very good, but she's better than she was during Twilight.

But yeah, cringe sauce all the way back then.

I don't know man. I watched the latest Charlie's Angels and Stewart was still pretty cringy.

As for Pattinson, my theory is he's always been a good actor but not a very charismatic one. He shines in roles that give him some meaty acting to work with, but feels bland if you cast him as your stereotypical male lead in an action-adventure movie.

Nam-Ek is literal fodder now. But do the Vampires have any feats to suggest they can subdue him or break his mask?

Originally posted by carthage
Nam-Ek is literal fodder now. But do the Vampires have any feats to suggest they can subdue him or break his mask?

Well Edward is one of the physically weakest vamps and he was still strong enough to uproot a tree and casually smash through marble.

Originally posted by tkitna
Was it Pattinsons or Stewarts awesome acting chops that sucked you in?

Those movies were enjoyable for 12 year olds. Thats about it.

Pattinson is unironically a very good actor. He was great in the Lighthouse and The King.

I've never actually seen the Twilight films and have no particular desire to.

Originally posted by h1a8
Like I said, you are an idiot for not thinking it was a good movie. Facts.

I took my gf (then) to see the movie when it came out (she wanted to see it). I figured it was some sappy girl chick flick before seeing it. After watching it I was highly impressed. It became my favorite vampire movie (trumping interview with a vampire).

Look how popular it was. Common sense tells you that you are in the minority and the idiot.

Of course you liked it. Like I said, it appeals to 12 year olds and teenagers. That's right in line with your IQ.