LOL Donald Trump is Going to F*cking Jail

I just got triggered badly. An ABC guest claimed Trump's lawyer cooperating is a big deal because attorney client privileges is one of the most protected privileges there is, and Trump never expected that to come out.

I am genuinely furious, but NOT for Trump. What angers me is the fact normally attorney/client privilege bars attorney's from disclosing past crimes, and only lets them admit to crimes in progress/planned crimes. Lawyers have admitted to being told by their client where the bodies of children are, and reburying them while keeping their secret.

So now you can have exceptions? Where were those kids exception? Did their parents ever learn they were in unmarked graves? Did they ever ger the bodies for a funeral? How many times have similar atrocities been covered up?

Our justice system is so corrupt, they should make it easier to have exceptions then they do.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Awful. 🙂

truly 🙂

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Called it long ago.

same 🙂

found this from 2017:

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
cool article

kinda makes you forget for a second that your beloved president might rot in a prison cell. 👆

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
truly 🙂

same 🙂

found this from 2017:

Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
I'm not from the South of England so no French for me. 😂

also 2017 (6 years ago)

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nah, trump will serve way more prison time than that.

🙂

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
also 2017 (6 years ago)

🙂

Originally posted by cdtm
Why's a Trump appointed judge getting this? Isn't that a conflict of interest, nobody else they could have assigned?

Because delicate flowers would be crying if it was someone appointed before or after Trump.

They'll still cry though. It's what they do.

Originally posted by Jaden_3.0
Sending Trump to jail on these charges is the equivalent of sending Al Capone to jail for tax evasion.

Justice is justice.

I mean ok, there's that, but that door swings both way. Just look at the allegations of bias at the Rittenhouse verdict. And how do we know the judge ISN'T biased? Just seems like you'd want someone as above board as you could find, a non Trump appointed Republican maybe.

Originally posted by cdtm
I mean ok, there's that, but that door swings both way. Just look at the allegations of bias at the Rittenhouse verdict. And how do we know the judge ISN'T biased? Just seems like you'd want someone as above board as you could find, a non Trump appointed Republican maybe.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
what happened in rittenhouses civil case CD? 🙂

Gonna be an interesting one. He "could" lose, it's possible with the lower burden of proof.

No idea how they'd sway a jury though after the infamous prosecution witnesses. They'd need more then "If he wasn't there they never would have engaged".

Mutual combat from Kimm Foxx may also muddy the water, if civil suits can use precedent from criminal cases.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Do you think foreign forum members understand soggy biscuit as a game or expression of mild abuse? 😂 itis from our playgrounds that children spread those rumours and made those quips. It's like the old Primary line we all got caught with at school. "Wankers cramp, do you get it?"... 9 year old Whirly replies "yes" older kids laugh. 11 year old Whirly makes 9 year old upset with same trick. 😂

Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
and soggy wank biscuits is just a funny image. 😂

did you wank before the biscuit or after it was made?

Also, why did maa make it soggy?

Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
did you wank before the biscuit or after it was made?

Also, why did maa make it soggy?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
discuss🙂

Honestly, it's way too early to celebrate, sure this is bad and this looks bad on the whole of Republican party and every Trumper who supported and still supports this truly dangerous clown.

Few things to remember:

A) it only takes one Trumper juror out of twelve jurors to just decide "I don't care about the mountains of evidence shown, my lord Trump is going free!", to ratf*ck the trial
B) the trial is set in Florida, that's a far-right shithole and Trump's home state*
C) the judge (unless she is replaced for the trial) is a Trump appointed judge who already has done some questionable acts
D) Jack Smith has overall gone easy on Trump with the charges, should more than the 37

*I know Jack smith picked Florida so Trump's lawyers couldn't protest that he was jury picking and delay the trial, but Florida gives Trump a super advantage

HoNeStLy, iT's wAy tOo EaRlY tO cEleBraTe

don't piss on my fun

We can celebrate that the traitor was indicted, will be arrested and will be arraigned on Tuesday. All a step towards him hopefully going where he belongs, prison.

All things Trumpers smugly said would "never" happen 🙂

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
what happened in rittenhouses civil case CD? 🙂

The Trump appointed Rightist judge with a history of doing questionable shit is a concern here.

Speaking of the murderer Rittenhouse and judges, that biased judge did everything in his power to sway the jury to the side of the defense. eg not allowing the audio recording of Rittenhouse talking about how he'd love to shoot/kill people, days before he shot and killed people.

Originally posted by Robtard
The Trump appointed Rightist judge with a history of doing questionable shit is a concern here.

Speaking of the murderer Rittenhouse and judges, that biased judge did everything in his power to sway the jury to the side of the defense. eg not allowing the audio recording of Rittenhouse talking about how he'd love to shoot/kill people, days before he shot and killed people.

He said civil case, you're talking criminal. The civil trial has yet to happen, but been green lit.