War Hulk vs Death Sentry

Originally posted by h1a8
He's not correct because you didn't argued otherwise nor meant it that way. You clearly meant that DS is able to reform from any damage that came from physical means.
For him to assume you meant that DS can't be temporarily damaged is an insult to your (and ours) intelligence.

Basically you said, "DS was beyond physical harm."
He replied,"He wasn't beyond physical harm."

Everyone and their mama knew what you meant, except idiot Galactic who wants to argue the wording and not the meaning.

I didnt debate Galactic because he was technically correct. Thor bashed his skull in, so he's technically not immune to physical harm. Of course he was fine moments afterwards, but its not the same thing.

Its not worth arguing about anyways.

Originally posted by tkitna
I didnt debate Galactic because he was technically correct. Thor bashed his skull in, so he's technically not immune to physical harm. Of course he was fine moments afterwards, but its not the same thing.

Its not worth arguing about anyways.

Tell him. ✅ Hes got a chip on his shoulder after my last debate with him thats all this is.

But youre of more sound and objective mind. Sentry is not beyond physical harm and it was important to establish that in a versus debate.

However he has immense regenerative capacity meaning that anything short of disintegration would mean he could regenerate in a sufficiently timely manner without it being counted as a loss under forum rulings.

War Hulk doesnt possess the necessary abilities to achieve such an outcome and is too much of a one trick pony to battle Sentry effectively, therefore Sentry wins. 🙂

Originally posted by tkitna
I didnt debate Galactic because he was technically correct. Thor bashed his skull in, so he's technically not immune to physical harm. Of course he was fine moments afterwards, but its not the same thing.

Its not worth arguing about anyways.

So either
1. He's wrong because he mistook what you meant (he assumed you meant can't be damaged at all).
Or
2. He knew what you meant and chose to argue wording. In that case he's still wrong because your wording was fine.

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Tell him. ✅ Hes got a chip on his shoulder after my last debate with him thats all this is.

But youre of more sound and objective mind. Sentry is not beyond physical harm and it was important to establish that in a versus debate.

However he has immense regenerative capacity meaning that anything short of disintegration would mean he could regenerate in a sufficiently timely manner without it being counted as a loss under forum rulings.

War Hulk doesnt possess the necessary abilities to achieve such an outcome and is too much of a one trick pony to battle Sentry effectively, therefore Sentry wins. 🙂

So you are still arguing wording, especially after he just clarified what his statement meant THRICE?

We can agree to disagree on what the wording means (Semantics) but you continuing to argue against something that wasn't claimed is asinine.
No one has stated nor meant DS can't be damaged.
Yet you keep stating that he can for what reason?
Still arguing Semantics?

Originally posted by h1a8
So you are still arguing wording, especially after he just clarified what his statement meant THRICE?

We can agree to disagree on what the wording means (Semantics) but you continuing to argue against something that wasn't claimed is asinine.
No one has stated nor meant DS can't be damaged.
Yet you keep stating that he can for what reason?
Still arguing Semantics?

If everyone knew what Tkitna meant, if no one was saying that Sentry couldnt be physically harmed (despite the words to the contrary) and i was therefore technically quite correct, why did you quote me and start what would therefore have been an entirely unnecessary discourse right from the start?

Why? 😕 Cos youre still mad 😆

Look at Tkitnas approach. He could see i was technically correct and just kept it moving. You however couldnt accept that and wanted to make a mountain out of a mole hill in a misguided attempt to achieve some kind of victory over me after i cooked you in June.

Let it go. Dont take debates so personally. I dont dwell on that previous debate, but it seems to be playing on your mind daily. Move on. No hard feelings 👆

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
If everyone knew what Tkitna meant, if no one was saying that Sentry couldnt be physically harmed (despite the words to the contrary) and i was therefore technically quite correct, why did you quote me and start what would therefore have been an entirely unnecessary discourse right from the start?

Why? 😕 Cos youre still mad 😆

Look at Tkitnas approach. He could see i was technically correct and just kept it moving. You however couldnt accept that and wanted to make a mountain out of a mole hill in a misguided attempt to achieve some kind of victory over me after i cooked you in June.

Let it go. Dont take debates so personally. I dont dwell on that previous debate, but it seems to be playing on your mind daily. Move on. No hard feelings 👆

He is bias against me and for you. He's not going to argue against you over me. So basically he's lying (unless he didn't understand at the time this is all about his initial statement).

But that's irrelevant.
A dumb idiot knew what tkitna meant, except you.

Why would a well know poster state that Sentry can't be physically damaged? Give him the benefit of the doubt. You should have assumed he meant healing factor. You just assume he's an idiot or something. That shows your intelligence (very low).

So I have evidence that "Beyond...." means end result is naught.
Tkitna meant it that way, exhibit A
Various comics used that expression to mean return to the original state, exhibit B.
Therefore you are not correct in what the phrase means.

Originally posted by h1a8
He is bias against me and for you. He's not going to argue against you over me. So basically he's lying (unless he didn't understand at the time this is all about his initial statement).

But that's irrelevant.
A dumb idiot knew what tkitna meant, except you.

Why would a well know poster state that Sentry can't be physically damaged? Give him the benefit of the doubt. You should have assumed he meant healing factor. You just assume he's an idiot or something. That shows your intelligence (very low).

So I have evidence that "Beyond...." means end result is naught.
Tkitna meant it that way, exhibit A
Various comics used that expression to mean return to the original state, exhibit B.
Therefore you are not correct in what the phrase means.

We dont work on assumptions here. Thats the sign of a weak debater. Which might explain why youre so willing to let assumptions slide. We all hold ourselves to different standards i guess. Each to their own.

Theres a difference between being able to recover from physical harm and not being able to be physically harmed at all. Said difference can decide the outcome in a versus match with rules around what's counted as a loss. For example If Sentry could be damaged to the point where he cant regenerate within a reasonable amount of time then thats a loss. If Sentry cant be physically damaged at all and hes facing a foe who is limited to fisticuffs then Sentry isnt losing.

Before you decided to quote me and make a hoo-hah about everything, i had already expanded on my original comment. Tkitna replied and we reconciled and came to an understanding.

You however, still sore from Junes debate and distinctly incapable of out debating me on a character vs character front (i.e. what this forum's bloody for) decided to try and make a debate out of semantics, when the discussion point had concluded even before your redundancy entered the fray.

Wishing you healing bro. You remain traumatised and that must suck. crutch

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
We dont work on assumptions here. Thats the sign of a weak debater. Which might explain why youre so willing to let assumptions slide. We all hold ourselves to different standards i guess. Each to their own.

Theres a difference between being able to recover from physical harm and not being able to be physically harmed at all. Said difference can decide the outcome in a versus match with rules around what's counted as a loss. For example If Sentry could be damaged to the point where he cant regenerate within a reasonable amount of time then thats a loss. If Sentry cant be physically damaged at all and hes facing a foe who is limited to fisticuffs then Sentry isnt losing.

Before you decided to quote me and make a hoo-hah about everything, i had already expanded on my original comment. Tkitna replied and we reconciled and came to an understanding.

You however, still sore from Junes debate and distinctly incapable of out debating me on a character vs character front (i.e. what this forum's bloody for) decided to try and make a debate out of semantics, when the discussion point had concluded even before your redundancy entered the fray.

Wishing you healing bro. You remain traumatised and that must suck. crutch

You can say what you want but it's clear that you are dense asf for not knowing what Tkitna meant. That was just plain stupid. Everyone here knows DS has been damaged.
Then you want to try to save face and argue what words mean.

You are wrong twice, for not understanding Tkitna and for the meaning of "beyond physical harm."

You started it with that silly reply.
Just admit that you were wrong twice.

Originally posted by h1a8
You can say what you want but it's clear that you are dense asf for not knowing what Tkitna meant. That was just plain stupid. Everyone here knows DS has been damaged.
Then you want to try to save face and argue what words mean.

You are wrong twice, for not understanding Tkitna and for the meaning of "beyond physical harm."

You started it with that silly reply.
Just admit that you were wrong twice.

Its not about not knowing what he meant, its about clarifying points and making someone commit to their perspective in writing. Its a strategy. You however carry on not clarifying a damn thing and debating based on assumptions and guesswork and look where thats gotten you lol.

As i said, we all hold ourselves to different standards.

My issue with what Tkitna said, was discussed and reconciled with Tkitna and all before your involvement and yet you tried to create further debate out of the issue anyway.

Let it go mate and rebuild your self esteem elsewhere. 👆

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Its not about not knowing what he meant, its about clarifying points and making someone commit to their perspective in writing. Its a strategy. You however carry on not clarifying a damn thing and debating based on assumptions and guesswork and look where thats gotten you lol.

As i said, we all hold ourselves to different standards.

My issue with what Tkitna said, was discussed and reconciled with Tkitna and all before your involvement and yet you tried to create further debate out of the issue anyway.

Let it go mate and rebuild your self esteem elsewhere. 👆

Strategy? No one here thinks DS is indestructible. Nothing needed to be clarified. You just had a dumb moment. Admit it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Strategy? No one here thinks DS is indestructible. Nothing needed to be clarified. You just had a dumb moment. Admit it.

You have demonstrated within this thread that dumb is your perpetual state.

Commiserations.

Once again, sorry i hurt your feelings last month, but get over it 😬