Originally posted by riv6672
Agree to disagree. 👆
That's it? "Achilles wins just cuz?"
LOL, no. Perseus took on and defeated the god of war, Ares. He is faster, stronger, and has a much higher damage soak than Achilles. Ffs he will swallowed by a used scorpion, and cut his way out of his guts with his sword.
Troy is a far better movie, and Achilles has one of my favorite one-shot battles in movie history, but...
Perseus stomps. As stated here, his stats are superhuman and guarantee a win unless he just stands there and lets Achilles attack him.
Thinking of Clash of the Titans, what a classic example of a mythological action good bad fun flick? Great cast going from set to set and from CGI action sequence to CGI action sequence, hamming it up all over the place, solid direction from Louis Letterier. The memes with Liam Neeson saying, "Release the Kraken!" are worth the price of admission alone.
Originally posted by NemeBro
Perseus' reactive spacetime shield would take the blade and automatically open a rift in reality behind Achilles' neck where his own blade would protrude from, stabbing him in his own neck.
Well that wouldn't be a fair fight now would it?
Spite thread then.
In the spirit of good debate.
We have Achilles as the better fighter and Perseus as better physical stats.
That's makes a good fight. Let's just keep it at that.
Both have swords or non spite weapons.
Otherwise what's the point?
Originally posted by NemeBroIf he has an autoshield that blocks attacks as a sentient being then why not inform the OP of the spite? He'll I can beat Achilles in this situation.
Yeah, then you'd know that Achilles has no chance of beating a temporal anomaly like Perseus who is also described as being a "sentient dimension hopping black hole" by Zeus himself.
If someone says Superman vs Daredevil. You just going to say Superman wins? That's pretty dumb
Imo, the OP wants Perseus to fight without such hax weaponry.
In other words, I believe you are wrong here.
Originally posted by RobtardI actually watched the 1st movie when it came out in theaters. But that is the only time I saw it. I remember nothing except that Perseus WASN'T RESISTANT TO CUTTING WEAPONS. I basically acted dumb and pretended to not know that.
Maybe you should watch Clash and Wrath of the Titans then.
Basic weaponry indeed. It's true that Perseus beats monsters and characters above his paygrade, but mostly due to plot convenience, not so much due to true superhuman stats. He's still vulnerable to regular weapons, so fighting someone as skilled as Achilles who is not doomed to lose for plot reasons, shouldnt make this all too onesided.
Originally posted by h1a8this works both ways. Add on the fact that Perseus was faster than achilles, and he had far superior weaponry and armor, and he was the literal son of zeus, and........ Well, I'm sure you took math in school. Perseus obliterates.
Again is Perseus resistant to bladed weapons. If say he were stabbed in the neck by a sword then what will happen? The sword will bend, brake, penetrate, etc?
Originally posted by h1a8
If he has an autoshield that blocks attacks as a sentient being then why not inform the OP of the spite? He'll I can beat Achilles in this situation.If someone says Superman vs Daredevil. You just going to say Superman wins? That's pretty dumb
Imo, the OP wants Perseus to fight without such hax weaponry.
In other words, I believe you are wrong here.
Wise words were once said:
Originally posted by h1a8
You shouldn't participate in debates if you don't know basic information about the characters.