She's just as likely to do that to him and what has he done she hasn't? She has gone up against FAR more superhuman opponents than Keaton has and most of her opponents were out to kill. Keaton were always led by some super goofy takeover Gotham plan from a lunatic.
Everyone knows that's a huge low showing for Namek. Black Widow could replicate that feat based off of everything she has done.
I think it could go either way and everyone is lowballing widow and highballing Keaton based off of one feat.
Originally posted by ShadowFyre
I think it could go either way and everyone is lowballing widow and highballing Keaton based off of one feat.
Well he didnt win, he died lol. The Flashes finished Nam-Ek off. Still it was impressive AF. But Im thinking more of the Russian soldiers he took on. That was damn impressive not to mention he was basically bullet proof in that costume and can basically jump from any height. So im defo going with Batman if Flash feats count.
Originally posted by riv6672
^^^I’m giving it to him either way (his reality in the solo movies was more comic-y), but that’s just me.^^^Yet not as handsome!
Yeah Limitations of choreography in that ruber suit and effects of the time. I mean hey just a few years later Val Kilmer Batman seemed more impressive (which was technically a sequel, so the same Batman).
But meh who cares, we have Flash feats now.
Batman probably does take it more out of 10, but Widow is superhuman herself going by film feats. eg When she jumped up and grabbed the Chitauri speeder, that would have dislocated a normal person's shoulder and she would have fallen to the ground, further injuring herself. She has more showings supporting her superhuman status, despite being just a human.
Her best chance is to take Batman out with her stun weapon from a distance and then move in for the kill while he's jizzing himself uncontrollably.