Mongul/The General vs Saitama

Started by carver92 pages
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
It's a yes or no question, lmao.

I edited my post. Check it out.

Damn. General Eiling has some pretty damn low showings in his latest incarnations, that are at odds with his highs.

team due to better feats

Isn't this spite?

Why?

I might be behind on my OPM, and if one wants to argue strictly in feats, I have no clue. But as far as "point of the character" I don't see how Saitama ever loses.

It depends on how things are being compared, really. Carver can clarify how stacked he needs the thread to be for Saitama to win.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
It depends on how things are being compared, really. Carver can clarify how stacked he needs the thread to be for Saitama to win.
I'm mainly saying that Saitama, as a character, is essentially unbeatable in the establishment of his world and of his character. I know that the vs forums here tend to be more feat-based – which is why I often don't really argue on here at all – so maybe what I'm saying falls on deaf ears, rightfully so, but it tends to be similar to the "Goku vs Superman" debate.

Superman, as a character, is the pinnacle of the term hero. He will always be just about the best that can be. Goku, as a character, is always about striving to become more. As a basis, it's essentially impossible for Goku to win, ever. Because Superman is always a step beyond, character-wise.

If we use fts, I think a solid argument can be made for Saitama. A very solid argument.

.....I am still confused what people are referring to as 'fts'.

Fights are feats. Lifting the statue of Liberty is a feat. Fighting Flashy Flash and Speed O sonic are feats. Outrunning bullets is a feat. They're all feats.

Ok. Fights are fts but Ive learned from someone that we cant just look at that. They posted a good example of Batman enduring Wonder Woman punches. At first I disagreed with that person, but I've learned that when im debating that person, fights really don't stack up well to fts. Only with that person, though.

Originally posted by carver9
Ok. Fights are fts but Ive learned from someone that we cant just look at that. They posted a good example of Batman enduring Wonder Woman punches. At first I disagreed with that person, but I've learned that when im debating that person, fights really don't stack up well to fts. Only with that person, though.

Does it not also depend on how many showings they have?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Does it not also depend on how many showings they have?

It depends. Superman vs Zaar was referenced as PIS and Zaar didnt have that many showings. So I guess it doesn't based off this same confused in the brain, person.

Originally posted by carver9
It depends. Superman vs Zaar was referenced as PIS and Zaar didnt have that many showings. So I guess it doesn't based off this same confused in the brain, person.

I said it was PIS? Did I now....

So how many showings does SUPERMAN have? I think you're very confused, maybe you're drunk? Or just stupid lol.

I remember trying to get clarity on whether statements counted or not. Do they?

I just realized Carver has you on an ignore list but clearly isn't ignoring you. 😆

Originally posted by Blight
I just realized Carver has you on an ignore list but clearly isn't ignoring you. 😆

Lmao he's the Kite Man to my Batman. The Condiment King, the Turner D Century to my Spider-Man.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I said it was PIS? Did I now....

So how many showings does SUPERMAN have? I think you're very confused, maybe you're drunk? Or just stupid lol.

I remember trying to get clarity on whether statements counted or not. Do they?

This you?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Yeah, pretty much this.

And yes, Leo initial post to my post was about PIS.

Spite in favor of Saitama

Originally posted by carver9
This you?

And yes, Leo initial post to my post was about PIS.

.....

So where am I saying the Rogol/Superman fight was PIS? Come on, Carv, try harder lol.