was James a seeker or chaser?!

think I've read in the phillosopher's stone dat he's a chaser.. altho in the movie, think it's mentioned dat he's a seeker.. (I dun have mah book rite naw..)
And I know dat in an interview, Rowling mentioned dat James is a chaser.
While in The Order of the Phoenix.. he's playin wid a snitch, which should mean he's a seeker, ait?! T__T

does neone know bout tis for sure?!

He a seeker I think it said that in 4rth or 3rd most likely 3rd and James is a bit stuck up but I like them him and sirius it was funny when they did those things to snape a little . But it was Funny when sirius said he bored and jame started pickingon snape for fun

yeah.. Snape's worst memory by far is my FAVORITE chapter of the book... I love the bond James, Sirius n Lupin have there...

well.. itz obvious why they're a bit stuck up.. I mean, they're all gorgeous n hot n smart, n they know it.. *giggles* well.. ya know those kind of ppl, ait?!
but dun u think it's better like dat?! I mean, I dun like when they're all perfect since they're really young, ya know?! all smart, really goodlooking, plus nice wid evrybody.. naw dat makes me sick!hehehe n dats unreal.. 🙂

Yah But they are really cool

also in the 1st movie when Hermione showed Harry the trophy it had James as seeker and did you know that McGonnagal was also there too.

He's a seeker! I don't think it even said in the first book..It just says he was a very good quidditch player (I just checked) But in the movie is says seeker, and it mentions it a few times in books 3,4,5!

also how:

Spoiler:
how James was catching the snitch in the 5th book

yeah.. i know.. but in the interview, Rowling said dat James was a chaser.. he could be both, as in was once seeker n chaser, in turn.. I'll post the link once I find where the interview was.

yeah.. I for sure noticed how the book naw is implying dat he's a seeker.

he's defintly a seeker

No, he's a chaser. It say so in the books(cant remember which) and Rowling herself said so in an interveiw. The 1st movie was wrong, I guess. And just because James is playing with a snitch, doesn't mean that he's a seeker, guys.

Guys he was a seeker, the person in the books that was mentioned to be a chaser was Charlie Weasley.

Every thing leads you to believe that he was a seeker, but on a web site my friend gave me to prove me wrong on this subject it says he's a chaser. http://www.hp-lexicon.org/james.html (Warning this site contains many spoilers to the 5th book!)

I knew it! hahahaha! No, kidding. I'm not teasing anyone. But if you'd pay more attention, it would be clearer and we wouldn't of had to make RonzMyBoy go to all that trouble to find it ^^;;

that doesn't mean he was a chaser, I mean, I've seen lots of sites that were wrong!

i dunno which one he was but if he was a chaser then that sucks. Seekers rule...

If JKR says in an interview that James was a chaser, then he is a chaser. Trust the author =) But Ive always been wondering about the snitch in the 5th book. Why else would he be playing with that snitch?

James was seeker, i am sure....

Well in the 5th book when he's playing with the snitch... lets think you cant exactly play with a quaffle by yourself now can you?

maybe we'll find out in future books. But if he is a chaser that sucks. And plus, in the 5th book it says James was catching it quickly and Peter was watching him in awe, does that prove something?

Originally posted by shanie623
But Ive always been wondering about the snitch in the 5th book. Why else would he be playing with that snitch?

To show off maybe