A rumor that a draft (and said draft) had been written started circulating the net some time ago.
Here's some news:http://www.killermovies.com/j/jurassicpark4/
A rumor that a draft (and said draft) had been written started circulating the net some time ago.
Here's some news:http://www.killermovies.com/j/jurassicpark4/
Jeez! the Third one was bad enough! The movies are dead. I mean com on.... You can't hear a phone through the stomach lineing of A Strapteosaurous 9Which by the way, is a water animal and was MUCH smaller. Then tehre is the whole "more dinos where clonned then originally allowed". the only GOOD thing about Jp3 was That the y FINALLY put the god damned feathers on the Raptor's head. (fossilized imprints where disscoverd in 1996 i think) Yet they talked to raptors, sorry buddy but no. Rators where as smart as primates, but sorry no. Everybody who did not see JP3 and read this, save yourself the cash that you would of used to buy or rent it. As for JP4... well It is almost certain tht it wil be good becasue they previous movie was:
CRAP!
So I hope they don't mean good as "We have just abour 100 raptors that will chase the exploroers, as they sudently Have MAchine guns, red bandanas, And Ammo Holder accrros ther front, as they fire at Grant He will go into bullet time, gain supernatural powers and Kung Fu kick all the raptors. The survoring dinsaurse will seem to eveolve rapitdly into Primates because this desease was radiactive, as some Un discovered U.S. Documents ALSO stated that they had nuclear tests not only on the Bikini Ilands but on the very islands, which is why A millionair was able to buy such a facility for soo cheap."
Does it show that I HATE Blockbuster movies, or is it just me?
yup, that's a pretty crappy way of thinking
but as I see it, ... JP 1 was WAY overrated, thought the dinos in some scenes were extremely crappy done (actually, can only remember 2 scenes that were ok-ish)
JP2 was just to make money from the idea (the only nice thing was the raptorfield)
JP3 was just ... crap piled on even more crap and those who wrote/made/participated in it, should be very ashamed of it
Yes and No, You see IN Return of The jedi, The effects are mostly color ins (light sabers)and Ships and all, so Blue Background matting done with MODELS of space craft., the background blur was filled in digitally and because it isn't a living breathing creature, but a pile of metle, (BIG pile of metel) it wasn't that hard. I mean com on! it was in 93! give it a break!
actually, crash,
I can go in to a lot of details about Star Wars developing the FX,
and I have to say that if there is a movie that did a GREAT job about getting FX right there on the spot, it was Star Wars and not JP, not by a LONG shot
SW perfectioned the Blue Screen, the Stop Motion, they got the moving on implacable figures made.
They got a lot of that, and JP didn't do a lot of evolving on the field of FX
Originally posted by yerssotWow big mistake, sorry! I corrected mine.
ST = Star Trek, never followed a serie nor saw a movie
SW = Star Wars; totally different story 😉Actually, Kesa, green screen is also used in the movie-industry 😉
I know its used in cinema but it was created by tv.
Plus miniatures and creating an animal are 2 different things.
Watch the new version of SW, the animals they added look terrible.