Was Sidious considering taking Maul back?

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Unbowed
The recent discussions about Maul/Ezra in Rebels and the S3 trailer made me consider just exactly why is Maul so keen on making Ezra his apprentice, to the point where he put his plan to use the battle station on Malachor in jeopardy by attacking Kanan and Ashoka.

That made me recall his arc in TCW, where he also took Savage as an apprentice. When they have their brief fight, Savage claims there is no need for either of them to be "dominant" but Maul clings to the Rule of Two and insists he is the master. At the time I thought it was just Maul's pride, but it occurred to me that the whole reason for the Rule of Two is so that the Sith become stronger. Both Sith, master and apprentice.

Their relationship is not the nurturing relationship of Jedi and Padawan. The Sith Master trains his Apprentice but he also abuses him and only begrudgingly shares his secrets. But it's not just the apprentice that is supposed to grow stronger, the master is also supposed to be constantly mindful of his apprentice's growing power so that he doesn't become complacent. The master is supposed to constantly be pushing himself further and further because of the fear of dying at the hands of his apprentice.

The master and the apprentice enter into a sort of Darwinist feedback loop, both helping each other but also both constantly pushing themselves for fear of the other.

Viewed in that light, several things in both TCW and the greater EU make sense:

-why Sidious ordered Ventress killed. It's not that he feared Ventress or facing Dooku and Ventress in combat, it's that he feared her and Dooku would constantly 'feed' off each other and in time Dooku would grow powerful enough to challenge Sidious himself.

-why Plagueis is instantly on guard when Sidious mentions Maul for the first time. He is apprehensive of Sidious taking "an apprentice, in defiance of our partnership"? It's only after Sidious lulls him to sleep and tells him "shh, he's not a real apprentice Master whistle "

-why Bane considered Krayt a heretic. It's not that Krayt wasn't powerful enough, it's that if his whole order obeyed him like a God-King, there would be no one to challenge him and thus Krayt would stop pushing himself. Wyyrlok's actions and betrayal confirm as much.

-in Shadow Conspiracy Maul thinks to himself that training Savage(among other things) has made him more powerful.

And so this wall of text brings us to this, Sidious finally confronting Maul:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7hBZNsPnyg

I make the contention that right until they finally met, Sidious was undecided on the Maul issue. I think that him taking Maul back was until that point a real possibility, and Sidious was mulling it.

What made Sidious decide? Savage's presence.

Watch the scene carefully. At first Sidious tells Maul he is impressed that he survived. I would say the tone is neutral/measured and that the statement is genuine, but Sidious is clearly sniffing Maul out as to what his intentions are. Then Maul swears his loyalty and Sidious is considering it("hmm..."wink. But then he glances towards Savage and he sees through the deception.

His tone becomes hostile and Sidious is clearly seething with anger. When he calls Maul a "rival" the word is almost a growl.

My belief is that it was Savage's presence that sealed Maul's fate. I think Sidious might have taken Maul back and had him become stronger as his apprentice was his original design until TPM. But having Maul become a rival, having Maul and Savage become stronger on their own, that was something he couldn't abide.

So what do you think? Would Sidious have taken Maul back into the fold in Maul hadn't taken Savage as an apprentice and began his Shadow Collective/Mandalorian shenanigans?

Beniboybling
That's... actually really interesting. But on the other hand Sheev later goes on to say that he has been "replaced", indicating that even if he believed Maul's pledge of allegiance to be genuine, he still would have disposed of him.

Unbowed
Originally posted by Beniboybling
That's... actually really interesting. But on the other hand Sheev later goes on to say that he has been "replaced", indicating that even if he believed Maul's pledge of allegiance to be genuine, he still would have disposed of him.
I considered that, but my post was already too long.

My opinion is that, given the timing of that statement(right after Savage is killed), Sidious is saying it as a taunt and more importantly a punishment. He didn't say it at the beginning of the fight, he spat it into Maul's face at the very end, right before he beat the shit out of him.

What precedes that statement is this: "Remember, always two there are."

It's as if Sidious is saying "You've broken the rules. If you would have placed yourself at my feet things might have been different, but you had the temerity to become a rival so this is what you get!"


And before someone inevitably mentions Anakin(or Dooku), I'm not saying Sidious would have necessarily chosen Maul over Anakin. But Maul isn't like Dooku.

Remember that Maul is someone Sidious saw a lot of potential in early on and he is the one Sidious chose as his successor in the original canon, and unlike Anakin, Sidious actually invested a lot of time and effort into Maul's training. At the end of the TPM novel Sidious is seething with anger over Maul's loss.

And now the apprentice the Jedi robbed from him is suddenly back, and he has not only survived his bisection and fall, but is stronger than ever. That had to impress Sidious a lot.

I definitely think he would have let Maul and Anakin duke it out for the spot. He would probably put Qui-Gon's killer in front of Anakin and incite him to anger, and then whoever killed the other would be his apprentice.

Fated Xtasy
Nice read actually.

quanchi112
No, because Sidious knew Maul wasn't the submissive pup Dooku had become. Maul was always destined to shine as a master while Dooku and Vader were just his submissive watchdogs.

Kurk
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, because Sidious knew Maul wasn't the submissive pup Dooku had become. Maul was always destined to shine as a master while Dooku and Vader were just his submissive watchdogs. thumb up

quanchi112
Originally posted by Kurk
thumb up

http://www.radiotimes.com/uploads/images/Original/110650.gif

Unbowed
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, because Sidious knew Maul wasn't the submissive pup Dooku had become. Maul was always destined to shine as a master while Dooku and Vader were just his submissive watchdogs.
That's a feature not a bug. "Darth Vader will become more powerful than either of us!

That's what an apprentice is supposed to do. Back in the early post-TPM EU Sidious only declares Maul a Sith Lord after Maul demonstrates a willingness to kill Sidious. And it's also why Sidious was constantly trying to snap Vader out of his funk and become more power hungry.

The point is that Maul was supposed to want to kill Sidious as his apprentice under the Rule of Two, not as a separate Sith Lord with his own apprentice.

quanchi112
Originally posted by Unbowed
That's a feature not a bug. "Darth Vader will become more powerful than either of us!

That's what an apprentice is supposed to do. Back in the early post-TPM EU Sidious only declares Maul a Sith Lord after Maul demonstrates a willingness to kill Sidious. And it's also why Sidious was constantly trying to snap Vader out of his funk and become more power hungry.

The point is that Maul was supposed to want to kill Sidious as his apprentice under the Rule of Two, not as a separate Sith Lord with his own apprentice. Darth Vader never reached these heights and what actually occurred was he even gave the emperor his son on a silver platter.

Vader allowed his own son to be his replacement but lucky for him Luke isn't the mentally weak pile of shit ahead see Vader is canonically known for. So you agree that Maul had his own agenda unlike Vader and Dooku who were more or less submissive pups. Vader didn't object as Luke tore into him nor did Dooku object when he ordered Anakin to execute him. Mental Weaklings.

Maul thinks for himself.

ares834

Trocity
thumb up

/thread

Darth Thor
Interesting theory. But I doubt he'd replace Dooku at that point in time, and was grooming Anakin for later.

But had Anakin and Savage not been around, and had Talzin not been a threat (that's a lot of IF's), then I'm sure Palpatine would consider replacing Dooku with Maul. He would probably get them both to prove who is the more worthy opponent (after TCW of course).

Also I like your idea of both Master and Apprentice growing stronger together. It explains why Rebels Maul is more useless than ever, when he's had plenty of time to grow stronger.

Jmanghan
Originally posted by quanchi112
http://www.radiotimes.com/uploads/images/Original/110650.gif LOL

chingchangwalla
He could probably use Maul in tandom with Vader tbh. Sids could just lock him up in a cage and feed him Cocaine then let him loose on Jedi, sit back and watch the carnage

S_W_LeGenD
I believe that Palpatine had moved on. Interesting observations nonetheless.

Darth Thor
Originally posted by chingchangwalla
He could probably use Maul in tandom with Vader tbh. Sids could just lock him up in a cage and feed him Cocaine then let him loose on Jedi, sit back and watch the carnage


So used as an Inquisitor? Wouldn't work. Maul's too ambitious for that. Rule of Two is there for a reason.

ILS
Yeah, astute observations indeed. Anakin does ultimately negate any chance Maul has of taking back his spot though.

chingchangwalla
Sidious just drives him insane then takes over his mind then.

Sinious
Yeah, Anakin's existence is the biggest problem with this theory, also anyone knows when Sidious decided to use Maul to bring down Talzin?

SunRazer
Anakin's the only one that Sheev had any long-term plans for. Both Dooku and Maul were just tools for Sheev's Clone Wars plan.

Beniboybling
Originally posted by SunRazer
Anakin's the only one that Sheev had any long-term plans for. Both Dooku and Maul were just tools for Sheev's Clone Wars plan. He had long term plans for Maul until he discovered Anakin, which happened to be around the same time as Maul's "demise."

SunRazer
I'm talking about during TCW.

And IIRC, he considered replacing Maul with Dooku in DP. In the same novel, Plagueis considered using Dooku as a backup if Sidious died or something.

Beniboybling
Eh as I recall before Maul's death Sidious only ever expressed interest in Dooku as a pawn he could use to create a rift in the Jedi Order, and at the point of Plagueis' death describes his intentions to use Maul has his apprentice to further the Grand Plan.

SunRazer
Perhaps. Sidious' take on Maul has been pretty ambiguous in the Legends continuity overall.

Beniboybling
Well we know that Sidious considered Maul's death on Naboo to be a loss, so at the very least he still had further use for him.

chingchangwalla
Would Sidious have taught Maul powers like lightning and Tutaminis if he survived?

ILS
I honestly believe even some writers buy into the misconception that Maul was just a "pawn" or "tool" rather than a real apprentice/Sith Lord, which furthers the misconception, e.g Sidious' mention in the Book of Sith. All Canon sources, Darth Plaguies, the Dark Side sourcebook and a few others have the correct interpretation of Maul's standing, even if the latter two are outdated in some ways.

SunRazer
Sidious' "pawn" take on Maul has been around for a really long time, too. I think it's even older than the Legends sources where he seriously considers keeping Maul as an apprentice. It kind of gets muddy in Legends - in Canon, it's pretty clear he wants to keep Maul until he learns about Anakin.

Unbowed
From what I can remember at this moment the first EU work to push the "Maul was just a took" BS was Jedi vs Sith: The Essential Guide to the Force.

relentless1
in plageuis novel sidious clearly says that Maul was a tool, never meant to be a true apprentice

ILS
He does indeed say that.

But if you keep on reading you find out that, *gasp*, he didn't tell his Rule of Two master that he was always planning on breaking the Rule of Two. Imagine that, a Sith who lies.

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.