KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Movies » Movie Discussion » Is 3D the next step for movies?

Is 3D the next step for movies?
Started by: coolmovies

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
coolmovies
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

Is 3D the next step for movies?

Is 3D the next step for movies?? Movies out at the moment in 3D are G force and Ice age 3. Also films like Terminator 2 and Titanic are going the same way.

One can only hope for a 3D version of Star Wars!!!!!!!!!!!!

Old Post Aug 4th, 2009 01:20 PM
coolmovies is currently offline Click here to Send coolmovies a Private Message Find more posts by coolmovies Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
MildPossession
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

Account Restricted

I'm not a fan of the trend at all. But as long as there is a choice of 2D and 3D for every film that's made, then I will be fine with it.

Old Post Aug 4th, 2009 02:55 PM
MildPossession is currently offline Click here to Send MildPossession a Private Message Find more posts by MildPossession Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Quincy
Debaser

Gender: Male
Location: Through The Looking Glass

It looks like thats the way things are progressing. But at least the glasses aren't those Blue and Red cardboard things anymore.


__________________



Sig by Scribble

Old Post Aug 4th, 2009 02:58 PM
Quincy is currently offline Click here to Send Quincy a Private Message Find more posts by Quincy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
coolmovies
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

I agree with you about the glasses

Old Post Aug 4th, 2009 06:33 PM
coolmovies is currently offline Click here to Send coolmovies a Private Message Find more posts by coolmovies Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
T.M
Welcome to The Suck

Gender: Male
Location: Mountains of Madness

quote: (post)
Originally posted by MildPossession
I'm not a fan of the trend at all. But as long as there is a choice of 2D and 3D for every film that's made, then I will be fine with it.


Ditto

I have never seen the point.


__________________

Old Post Aug 4th, 2009 06:37 PM
T.M is currently offline Click here to Send T.M a Private Message Find more posts by T.M Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BruceSkywalker
The BatLord of the Jedi

Gender: Male
Location: The Batcave

3-d has been around since the '50s..

quote: (post)
Originally posted by coolmovies
Is 3D the next step for movies?? Movies out at the moment in 3D are G force and Ice age 3. Also films like Terminator 2 and Titanic are going the same way.

One can only hope for a 3D version of Star Wars!!!!!!!!!!!!



thats because the studio wants some extra money


__________________


THE TRIAL NEVER ENDS...thanks steve

Old Post Aug 4th, 2009 06:59 PM
BruceSkywalker is currently offline Click here to Send BruceSkywalker a Private Message Find more posts by BruceSkywalker Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
botankus
Bass-ackwards

Gender: Male
Location: Eastern NC

Yeah, I love reading posts which infer that the cinema industry began in 2004.


__________________

Old Post Aug 4th, 2009 07:03 PM
botankus is currently offline Click here to Send botankus a Private Message Find more posts by botankus Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
coolmovies
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

They are also introducing 3D TV's i thought it was LED TV next in line ??

Old Post Aug 4th, 2009 07:35 PM
coolmovies is currently offline Click here to Send coolmovies a Private Message Find more posts by coolmovies Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
MildPossession
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

Account Restricted

quote:
I have never seen the point.


I wouldn't mind if it didn't do my head in. Like motion sickness gets on my nerves. It doesn't make me sick but I get a headache after just a little 3D action, so a whole hour or two would be hell.

2D for me thanks.

Old Post Aug 4th, 2009 08:19 PM
MildPossession is currently offline Click here to Send MildPossession a Private Message Find more posts by MildPossession Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Tired-Hiker
El Bastardo

Gender: Male
Location: Sailing the seas of cheese.

I'm not sure paying the extra few bucks to see a movie in 3-D is worth it. I was very impressed with the trend when Beowolf came out. But after seeing Avatar, I pretty much got so used to it that I didn't even notice it anymore. The 'wow' effect has been lost. When it comes to big action blockbusters, I'd prefer a huge screen with loud sound over 3-D if it's going to save me some money.

It would be cool if they could make 3-D movies where you can actually focus on anything in the frame that you choose to. That would be pretty neat, but then it would probably lose it's 'wow' factor soon after as well.


__________________

Last edited by Tired-Hiker on Dec 27th, 2009 at 10:04 PM

Old Post Dec 27th, 2009 10:02 PM
Tired-Hiker is currently offline Click here to Send Tired-Hiker a Private Message Find more posts by Tired-Hiker Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube

Gender: Male
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Moderator

The only time I've ever really been impressed with 3D was with Avatar. Using it to simply add depth to the images, rather than having everything popping out so that it becomes distracting.

The glasses are annoying too, since I have to wear them on top of my normal glasses.


__________________

Old Post Dec 27th, 2009 10:04 PM
BackFire is currently offline Click here to Send BackFire a Private Message Find more posts by BackFire Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
rox
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

the final destination movie is the only one i have liked. only because that tire scene where everyone in the room ducked


__________________

Old Post Dec 27th, 2009 11:54 PM
rox is currently offline Click here to Send rox a Private Message Find more posts by rox Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
jinXed by JaNx
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Pittsburgh

I don't know if it's the future of movies but i think it's definitely the future of Cinema. I agree with most of you. I feel that 3-D is an expensive gimmick. I do, however appreciate that there are filmmakers out there that are trying to do something worthwhile and new with the technology. Filmmakers and movie studios need to do something today that will convince people that going to the Cinema is worthwhile. Today the average consumer can have cutting edge media technology in their home. When you have a 42 inch lcd screen and THX certified surround sound in your home you're probably less likely to take a gamble on a movie when it will be on dvd in in a month or two.

3-D and Imax is an experience that you can only get in the theater and Studios are going to exploit this as much as possible. That's why we have movies shown in 3-D that shouldn't. The only movies i've seen in 3-D that made me feel justified in the extra cost was Beowulf, The Polar Express and Avatar. I like the idea of 3-D but it's rare that a movie is able to utilize the technology properly. Hopefully filmmakers will follow, Camerons route and learn from him.

I would like to see someone improve upon Camerons new cameras because he came very close to achieving a 3-d experience that lasted the entire length of the movie.


__________________
"If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)

Old Post Dec 28th, 2009 11:45 AM
jinXed by JaNx is currently offline Click here to Send jinXed by JaNx a Private Message Find more posts by jinXed by JaNx Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
H. S. 6
Approaching the End

Gender: Male
Location: Ministry of Magic

quote: (post)
Originally posted by BackFire
The only time I've ever really been impressed with 3D was with Avatar. Using it to simply add depth to the images, rather than having everything popping out so that it becomes distracting.


thumb up

I saw Beowulf in 3D and didn't enjoy it at all, but the 3D effects in Avatar were well done.


__________________



Old Post Dec 28th, 2009 11:35 PM
H. S. 6 is currently offline Click here to Send H. S. 6 a Private Message Find more posts by H. S. 6 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
FistOfThe North
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: United States, Earth

current 3d will only get better from now on because of avatar. the only thing that could or would top avatar now be virtual 3d. or virtual reality. but i believe 3d has a few more stages to go through before being perfected into what it's truly suppose to be: a truly emmersive visual environmental experience the likes of regular human vision and experience. it'll get to that point within 2 decades at most. then virtual reality is what cinemas'll try out next with that being perfected in a decade. same thing with home media.

it'll be great.


__________________
"The darkside, Sidious, is an illness no true Sith wishes to be cured of, my young apprentice .."

- Darth Plagueis

Old Post Dec 29th, 2009 09:32 PM
FistOfThe North is currently offline Click here to Send FistOfThe North a Private Message Find more posts by FistOfThe North Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Tired-Hiker
El Bastardo

Gender: Male
Location: Sailing the seas of cheese.

Go see a play. The 3-D is AMAZING!!!!!


__________________

Old Post Jan 1st, 2010 06:50 PM
Tired-Hiker is currently offline Click here to Send Tired-Hiker a Private Message Find more posts by Tired-Hiker Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
S_D_J
Bane

Gender: Male
Location: Coming to Gotham

quote: (post)
Originally posted by BackFire
The only time I've ever really been impressed with 3D was with Avatar. Using it to simply add depth to the images, rather than having everything popping out so that it becomes distracting.

The glasses are annoying too, since I have to wear them on top of my normal glasses.


Agreed

Avatar is the first movie I've seen trying to achieve an immersive 3D experience.

Every time I go see a movie, I always choose the 3D version (as long as there is a 3D version) just cuz I like the gimmick... but so far that's what it's been, a gimmick barely used in a movie except for the gimmicky bullet/car/tire/whatever flying at your face.

that said, I think 3D is not suitable for all genres, so I think there will still be normal 2D movies being made

... besides it makes your eyes hurt after a while


__________________


"When Gotham is ashes, you have my permission to die." -BANE

Old Post Jan 2nd, 2010 03:03 AM
S_D_J is currently offline Click here to Send S_D_J a Private Message Find more posts by S_D_J Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
xJLxKing
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: United States

I am really not a fan of the way 3-D is being used by movies lately. The part where object seemed to be thrown in your face is being overused. That's all 3-D is about. It's nice at first, but gets boring. The way 3-D is used in Avatar is better. It really doesn't have stuff popping in your face. It's more about the enivirmonent


__________________

Old Post Jan 2nd, 2010 05:09 AM
xJLxKing is currently offline Click here to Send xJLxKing a Private Message Find more posts by xJLxKing Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 06:27 PM.
  Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Movies » Movie Discussion » Is 3D the next step for movies?

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.