Ok, i went to see both The Avengers & The Dark Knight Rises, and my home boys, said that The Dark Knight was way better than The Avengers, and i think otherwise, i want to know from you all who has seen both movies which one you think is really better, with all mistakes such as that lame a$$ Bane, compared to Loki......
*random opinion on subjective question
*implication of directors' true motivations/tendencies/weaknesses
*hope for {insert arbitrary villain/reboot} in the sequel
just about each and every film has plot holes and I have got to say that I couldn;t care less about them.. plot holes do not diminish the way I feel about a film
"The Daemon lied with every breath. It could not help itself but to deceive and dismay, to riddle and ruin. The more we conversed, the closer I drew to one singularly ineluctable fact: I would gain no wisdom here."
ya, fair enough. Dark Knight was worth seeing Ledger as Joker, Bale has been fairly commendable... though I'd love to know who came up with that voice.
EDIT: Acting in the Avengers was, comparatively, terrible, but that might have been more a reflection of the writing than the actors.
__________________ yes, a million times yes
Last edited by tsilamini on Jul 25th, 2012 at 09:29 PM
I actually meant Bale's growling Batman voice. I get what they were going for, but it destroyed the immersion of the scene every time he talked, to me at least.
Like, the scene where he was interrogating the Joker in the police station, I know it was supposed to be an intense scene, but every time Batman talked I wanted to laugh.
Haven't seem DKR, but the promise of growling vs distorted accent is very appealing to the cynic in me.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 25th, 2012 05:52 PM
