|
 |
Who wins?
You do not have permission to vote on this poll. |
| Federation wins |
   |
1 |
14.29% |
| Imperials crush them. |
   |
6 |
85.71% |
| Total: |
7 votes |
100% |
|
| |
|
Janus Marius
Plo Koon Rulez!
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
|
ST Versus SW (Different Parameters)
Remember the Battle of Hoth in the beginning of ESB? Replace the Rebels with Federation forces. Who wins?
|
Feb 19th, 2006 04:40 PM |
|
|
| |
|
Fishy
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
Federation is screwed and there ships would die trying to run...
__________________
Thanks TWelling4Ever
|
|
Feb 19th, 2006 05:09 PM |
|
|
| |
|
Lucius
Unknown
Registered: Jun 2005
Location:
|
Federation are screwed... replace the federation with Species 8472 and then you have a possible conflict.
|
|
Feb 19th, 2006 09:40 PM |
|
|
| |
|
Janus Marius
Plo Koon Rulez!
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
|
Yeah, conflict.
|
|
Feb 19th, 2006 11:54 PM |
|
|
| |
|
jedi2187
tha l'il guy
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Praha
|
The Feds would run like the Silver Surfer runs from Galactus when he gets that
look in his eye and pulls out the jar of crunchy peanut butter.
__________________
|
|
Feb 21st, 2006 03:33 PM |
|
|
| |
|
FE Expert
Fire Emblem expert
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
|
You may be rabid Warsies, I'm not that rabid a trekkie.
If Federation infantry or Argos can hit the legs or the guns of AT-ATs and vaporize either of them, the AT-ATs are no more. Otherwise, the Imps are a match for Federation redshirts, if Federation uniforms protect them from cold. If Federation infantry can close under the legs of an AT-ST, they can vaporize a leg joint at point-blank range and destroy the AT-STs.
__________________
These are the links to my stories!
Starcraft vs. Star Wars: Battle Scouts
Fire Emblem: Fundraiser
Name a number between 1 and 10
Pandemonium
|
|
Feb 21st, 2006 04:39 PM |
|
|
| |
|
jedi2187
tha l'il guy
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Praha
|
Well, that's the thing. If the red shirts try to focus on attacking the AT-AT's at the legs, I hope one of them is paying attention to the snowtroopers that can or are deployed on the ground.
__________________
|
|
Feb 22nd, 2006 09:50 PM |
|
|
| |
|
REXXXX
Networking
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: San DiegoModerator
|
And we know it can vaporize AT-AT armor how...?
__________________
|
|
Feb 23rd, 2006 02:20 AM |
|
|
| |
|
General Kon-El
Last Son of the Sith
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Latveria, Europe, Earth
|
wait, wait, what does ST for?
__________________
|
|
Feb 23rd, 2006 02:24 AM |
|
|
| |
|
SnakeEyes
Connoisseur
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: AMERICA
|
Ummm... Star Trek.
__________________
"Nothing is ever as good as you can imagine it."
|
|
Feb 23rd, 2006 02:34 AM |
|
|
| |
|
jedi2187
tha l'il guy
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Praha
|
Lest we forget Star Trek History 101.... red shirt ensigns have a shelf life of a fruit fly. They're the only officers in the Federation that have an expiration date on their business cards. Poor bast*rds....
The Fed squads can try and assemble to take out the AT-AT's kneecaps, a la Tonya Harding, but once again they need to keep in mind the snowtroopers, the AT-ST's, the guy in black armor leading them that sounds like he has asthma all his life, etc...
__________________
|
|
Feb 23rd, 2006 03:02 AM |
|
|
| |
|
Lord Lucien
Lets all love Lain
Registered: Jul 2005
Location:
|
An AT-AT maybe, but the AT-ST's are quite fast, I doubt that they could get a good lock-on to the knee joints without first having their torso vaporized.
__________________
Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.
|
|
Feb 23rd, 2006 03:30 AM |
|
|
| |
|
Jack Daniels
WOW!
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: I know where I would like to be
|
replace all the laser cannons with phasers you got damage...but yes redshirts do have a short expiration date!...LMAO...but so do storm troopers...lol....they are worse shots though! And another thing AT AT do not have shields just thich armor nothing prevent transporters from being in and taking them over......I dont think SW would even waste time trying to fight ST forces on the ground would be all ariel attack...ships with shields....anyways I think the battle would have to go different for SW to win...
__________________
|
|
Feb 23rd, 2006 04:07 AM |
|
|
| |
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 03:51 AM. |
|
|
| |
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
Text-only version |
|
|
