I think Mara Jade would do more than touch her. Her training as an Emperor's Hand and her additional training with Luke and war experience make her a formidable opponent. As I recall, she beat Lumiya once, too.
Bastilla really isn't uberpowerful, Nebaris. She's less than Maul. :s
Edit: And Depa, btw, would WTFpwn Bastilla - who is nowhere near being close to Mace - and Depa was stated to be a better swordsman than him.
She is, and she'd firmly beat anybody you just named. You can't deny that owning powerful Dark Jedi in saber combat while still only a padawan makes her pretty uber. That alone puts her above those you mentioned in my eyes, given the training, experience and general growth she subsequently gained. Bastilla just simply hasn't had enough exposure, but given what we know, we can guess that she's one of the best.
Last edited by Apollo Cloud on Apr 1st, 2007 at 04:38 AM
Depa? Lmao, Nebaris, I'm losing sympathy for you and my feelings of hospitality and neutrality are fading. Depa would annihilate her in lightsaber combat.
Mace? Dream on, my friend. Dream on.
Gee. Guess we should give Obi-Wan an award for actually defeating a Sith Lord (who is far more powerful than anyone in Revan's cadre of dark Jedi). TPM Obi-Wan is already a mile ahead of Bastilla, by your logic.
Get some glasses, then.
Bastilla simply has no talent beyond her Battle Meditation, and she's not even the best in that department.
2. Despite Malak, she'd beat anybody on that list, she's simply too good.
3. What is it with you and threatening to start getting uncivil whenever we're on the opposite sides in a debate? Lol, seriously man, we may very different opinions, but that's no need to take anything too personally.
The difference is, Obi-Wan was getting his ass kicked, and got lucky. Bastilla was actually completely owning her opponent, which speaks for far more than what Obi-Wan did.
Proof for this? Given that Maul was simply a random force user that Sidious found that hadn't been discovered by the Jedi, whereas the Dark jedi with Revan were likely the elite of an entire order of them, I wouldn't say Maul is necessarily more powerful.
No, not really.
1. I see no reason to believe that Maul was more powerful than the Dark jedi Bastilla owned.
2. As I previously mentioned, Bastilla owned her opponent, whereas Obi-Wan was getting owned and managed to get a lucky shot to win.
3. Bastilla improved incredibly after the point in case.
Now now, if you're gonna be doing that, at least add in the [Advent]s.
From what we know, she is, and it's funny how you constantly say that she only has one talent, despite me posting an entire essay's worth of them each time.
No, I'm good, though I'm thinking you need to come to terms with the fact that less exposure =/ less power.
Last edited by Apollo Cloud on Apr 1st, 2007 at 05:25 AM
I did, and you said that Bastilla would "firmly beat anybody I named".
Wrong. Malak isn't on that list, and if you mean "someone I mentioned", then she'd go down to Maul, Depa, and Mace. Hard.
Because your opinions eventually cross the line from supportable to completely stupid.
Right. And "random Dark Jedi X" > Powerful Sith Lord.
Maul is "one of the deadliest Sith apprentices in history" (according to the Visual Guide, which is more canon than your interpretations of some weak Dark Jedi). There goes your entire point.
Furthermore, yes, that's exactly Sidious's intent. Recruit some weak Force user and dedicate twenty years into indoctrinating him in the Force to become his apprentice and enforcer. Right.
That was sarcasm, by the way, as his entire M.O. has been to get the "stronger apprentice".
Mar 31st, 2007 02:56 AM
