KMC Forums

 
  REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Already a member? Log-in!
 
 
Home » Star Wars » Star Wars: Literature & Expanded Universe » Do You Think Darth Maul Should've Died?


Do You Think Darth Maul Should've Died?
Started by: Spudman43

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
Spudman43
Junior Member

Registered: May 2009
Location: Honolulu, HI


 

Do You Think Darth Maul Should've Died?

Should Maul have died to Obi'Wan? Or should he have gone on to own the entire Jedi Order?

I think Maul is just too badass to have been killed like that. His skills with a lightsaber are far greater than anyone (except Revan) before him, and he could totally defeat any of the Jedi heroes introduced later in the saga.

Old Post May 11th, 2009 09:56 AM
Click here to Send Spudman43 a Private Message Find more posts by Spudman43 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Dominis
Senior Member

Registered: Sep 2008
Location: Physically nowhere.....


 

Huh????


__________________
"The power of the dark side is an illness no true Sith would wish to be cured of" -Darth Plagueis

Old Post May 11th, 2009 10:05 AM
Click here to Send Dominis a Private Message Find more posts by Dominis Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Spudman43
Junior Member

Registered: May 2009
Location: Honolulu, HI


 

Do you think Darth Maul was too good to die? Should he have lived on into the Star Wars Saga?

Old Post May 11th, 2009 10:39 AM
Click here to Send Spudman43 a Private Message Find more posts by Spudman43 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Dominis
Senior Member

Registered: Sep 2008
Location: Physically nowhere.....


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Spudman43
Do you think Darth Maul was too good to die? Should he have lived on into the Star Wars Saga?


Well it would not have been right if he didn't.

I meant "huh" about him and Revan being the best duelists. It was a joke, right?


__________________
"The power of the dark side is an illness no true Sith would wish to be cured of" -Darth Plagueis

Last edited by Dominis on May 11th, 2009 at 10:54 AM

Old Post May 11th, 2009 10:50 AM
Click here to Send Dominis a Private Message Find more posts by Dominis Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Rampant ox
Senior Member

Registered: Mar 2006
Location:


 

Count Dooku was a better villain than Darth Maul; making his death a necessity.


__________________

Old Post May 11th, 2009 11:04 AM
Click here to Send Rampant ox a Private Message Find more posts by Rampant ox Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
CadoAngelus
Zanpakuto

Registered: Mar 2009
Location: Seireitei


 

Re: Do You Think Darth Maul Should've Died?

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Spudman43
Should Maul have died to Obi'Wan? Or should he have gone on to own the entire Jedi Order?

I think Maul is just too badass to have been killed like that. His skills with a lightsaber are far greater than anyone (except Revan) before him, and he could totally defeat any of the Jedi heroes introduced later in the saga.


If a padawan level Obi-Wan could defeat him, he could not have gone on to "own" any jedi hero. Granted Maul was an exceptional duelist...


__________________


CadoAngelus - Savior, Conqueror, Hero, Villain.

Old Post May 11th, 2009 01:54 PM
Click here to Send CadoAngelus a Private Message Find more posts by CadoAngelus Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
mattatom
UNSC's finest.

Registered: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada.


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by CadoAngelus
If a padawan level Obi-Wan could defeat him, he could not have gone on to "own" any jedi hero. Granted Maul was an exceptional duelist...


Maul did 'own' Anoon Bondara and Qui Gon both Jedi Master rank. Both of which were on/meant to be on the council.
Granted that Mace/Yoda WOuld have little problem dispatching him.
Hell, Both their respective Padawans lasted longer against Maul than the master did.
quote: (post)
Originally posted by Spudman43
Should Maul have died to Obi'Wan? Or should he have gone on to own the entire Jedi Order?

I think Maul is just too badass to have been killed like that. His skills with a lightsaber are far greater than anyone (except Revan) before him, and he could totally defeat any of the Jedi heroes introduced later in the saga.

Hero? Specifics please.

Imho, Qui Gon deserved more screen time even if it was only as a ghost in AotC/RotS.


__________________
Every time this fool be come along
He gots you noobs cryin' out fo' mom
Leave the scene lookin' like Vietnam
Might as well call him "Matt Atom Bomb"
Like his name suggests, he's quite atomic
And this fool - he likes DC Comics
Two energy swords make up his symbol
And trust me, dawg, this homie's nimble

Last edited by mattatom on May 11th, 2009 at 03:04 PM

Old Post May 11th, 2009 03:00 PM
Click here to Send mattatom a Private Message Find more posts by mattatom Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Darth Rex
Dark Lord Of The Cookies

Registered: Jan 2009
Location: A Galaxy Far Far Away! Top Secret C


 

Maul had to be gotten rid of because he couldn't be a public face for the CIS like dooku was maul was like an animal, Lucas had to get another character


__________________

CREATED BY SCYTHE
THE TRANSFORMERS KNOW-IT-ALL!

Old Post May 11th, 2009 06:32 PM
Click here to Send Darth Rex a Private Message Find more posts by Darth Rex Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Spudman43
Junior Member

Registered: May 2009
Location: Honolulu, HI


 

By heroes I mean that Darth Maul was a better duelist than Luke. But I realize that he would have had trouble with Anakin...

Old Post May 11th, 2009 06:35 PM
Click here to Send Spudman43 a Private Message Find more posts by Spudman43 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Elite Hunter
Senior Member

Registered: Dec 2006
Location:


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Spudman43
By heroes I mean that Darth Maul was a better duelist than Luke. But I realize that he would have had trouble with Anakin...


LOTF Luke would destroy Maul. ROTS Anakin would beat him too.

Old Post May 11th, 2009 06:42 PM
Click here to Send Elite Hunter a Private Message Find more posts by Elite Hunter Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BruceSkywalker
The BatLord of the Jedi

Registered: Dec 2006
Location: The Batcave


 


__________________


THE TRIAL NEVER ENDS...thanks steve

Old Post May 11th, 2009 06:46 PM
Click here to Send BruceSkywalker a Private Message Find more posts by BruceSkywalker Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
xxxpoppunker182
Senior Member

Registered: May 2005
Location: United States


 

I would have liked it better if Maul didn't die in ep1 and they fleshed his character out more in ep2 and finally have him killed in ep3 and then just had dooku manipulated by palpatine throughout ep2-3

Old Post May 11th, 2009 07:31 PM
Click here to Send xxxpoppunker182 a Private Message Find more posts by xxxpoppunker182 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Lord Lucien
Lets all love Lain

Registered: Jul 2005
Location:


 

If what happened in AotC happened as Ep. I, then there would have been room for both Maul and Dooku, Dooku replacing Maul in Ep. 2 after a whole movie and a half of him being a good guy.


__________________
Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.

Old Post May 11th, 2009 07:38 PM
Click here to Send Lord Lucien a Private Message Find more posts by Lord Lucien Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
xxxpoppunker182
Senior Member

Registered: May 2005
Location: United States


 

I think the series would have been better off that way and then maul wouldn't have been killed by a padawan but by a knight till should be obi-wan who kills him though

Old Post May 11th, 2009 08:51 PM
Click here to Send xxxpoppunker182 a Private Message Find more posts by xxxpoppunker182 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Gideon
Restricted

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Your Mom.

Account Restricted


 

Define 'should'. Based on what perameters? If you mean as regards the fulfillment of George Lucas's design for Palpatine's schemes, then yes, he should have died; his role was to be a mindless, vicious enforcer that would put the fear of [God?] into the Jedi and embody the Sith threat. But Palpatine would need a more charismatic and politically active agent to be his proxy in the Confederacy; Maul's talents were within the realm of death, not politics (though one could argue they are the same as far as the Emperor is concerned).

If we were to scrap or manipulate the Rule of Two, Maul could have functioned as the more aggressive, physical agent whereas Dooku handled the politicking and aristocracy, with Palpatine lording over them both. It would be possible for the two to coexist peacefully under Sidious, since neither Maul nor Dooku ever planned to betray him.

Old Post May 11th, 2009 09:02 PM
Click here to Send Gideon a Private Message Find more posts by Gideon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Lord Lucien
Lets all love Lain

Registered: Jul 2005
Location:


 

Though it would have been neat to seem them trying to betray each other.


__________________
Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.

Old Post May 11th, 2009 09:05 PM
Click here to Send Lord Lucien a Private Message Find more posts by Lord Lucien Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Gideon
Restricted

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Your Mom.

Account Restricted


 

Not really.

Dooku is more powerful than Maul in the Force, more manipulative in general, and (technically) the head of state of the Confederacy.

Maul's a really badass fighter. The only way it would be interesting is if it came down to a saberfight. But otherwise, you'd be setting up Maul for "a lulz epic fail!!1"

Old Post May 11th, 2009 09:12 PM
Click here to Send Gideon a Private Message Find more posts by Gideon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
CadoAngelus
Zanpakuto

Registered: Mar 2009
Location: Seireitei


 

If Maul had survived, it might have been Maul in place of Dooku on Geonosis...the events could have turned out very differently...

Possible differences in the story are fun to explore...Yoda could have duelled with Maul for example, that would have been interesting. Nevertheless, Yoda would have won...


__________________


CadoAngelus - Savior, Conqueror, Hero, Villain.

Old Post May 11th, 2009 09:13 PM
Click here to Send CadoAngelus a Private Message Find more posts by CadoAngelus Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Lord Lucien
Lets all love Lain

Registered: Jul 2005
Location:


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Gideon
Not really.

Dooku is more powerful than Maul in the Force, more manipulative in general, and (technically) the head of state of the Confederacy.

Maul's a really badass fighter. The only way it would be interesting is if it came down to a saberfight. But otherwise, you'd be setting up Maul for "a lulz epic fail!!1"
My definition of neat. Which frankly answers the question : Yes, Maul should have died.


__________________
Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.

Old Post May 11th, 2009 09:14 PM
Click here to Send Lord Lucien a Private Message Find more posts by Lord Lucien Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Gideon
Restricted

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Your Mom.

Account Restricted


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Lord Lucien
My definition of neat. Which frankly answers the question : Yes, Maul should have died.


...

On the other hand, Sidious probably wouldn't let him do it. And if there's anything that embodies "neat" to me, it's Dooku being pimpsmacked, verbally and otherwise, by Sidious.

Old Post May 11th, 2009 09:15 PM
Click here to Send Gideon a Private Message Find more posts by Gideon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 07:11 AM.
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< Contact Us - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Forum powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.