I agree that physically Cap might be slightly superior to Batman, but you have to consider the fact that Bruce is extremely knowledgeable in many different forms of martial arts and also his knowledge of deadly pressure points may give him a great advantage.
Cap also knows pressure point combat, and utilizes it against his opponents. Before Batman utilized them on Solomon Grundy, Cap used them on Hulk and was able to hold his own, and even throw the big lug like he was a fly.
Like I mentioned before, it would probably be like the fight from Deathstroke 7. Want me to post it?
Well, remember, in this fight Captain America doesn't have his shield. I think he's more used to fighting with a shield than Batman is with his utility belt.
Cap's fighting style isn't reliant on his shield like most think. It's used mostly as a projectile and for defense, and it's not like he hasn't done anything without it either.
The shield helps close the gap between him and a superpowered opponent. Batman doesn't have superpowers.
Not really. Cap utilizes them a lot. Thats why his shield shots do so much damage to superpowered opponents. You'd have to know pressure points to pull off the things he does. That's why USAgent only uses his shield as a battering ram, whereas Cap is more precise.
Anyways i go with cap. He's the kind of fighter that takes on dozens of Hydra... goes up against spiderman... cuts the rug with iron man... has taken down the hyde..
spiderman's even said that caps got one of the hardest punches he's ever taken...
all that said? its a 50/50 draw.
caps more power (though he does have finesse) but bats is more skill...
cap could be said to know less overall martial arts, but what he knows is applicable in real life combat. and he utilizes it well. Not all martial arts (ie. Taekwondo.) were made for actual combat.
ps2 vs xbox. lesser tech vs greater tech. Who won that war? the lesser. Why? greater application of what it could do.
Current video games... eh whatever.. but thats the jist of my point.
__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."
KMC Community Forums
Feb 5th, 2007 09:48 PM
