If Glads can keep his confidence at a high level (stupidest weakness ever) he can take it plus he is by bounds and leaps a better fighter.
If otherwise Sentry for a very slight majority.
Thank you saying that. Sentry is nothing compared to Glads either way though. He doesn't stand a chance really since he has never taken on anybody this level of power. He would loose. It so funny how some one would put Sentry but have nothing to back it up..............
I'm not sure whether you actually read the comic but Hulk was pounding on a weak Gladiator that had already been exposed to radiation that made him weak and was already in a fight before. Its just like Superman being exposed to Green k to the point where Batman can hurt him. Plus Sentry lost to banner. He didn't even loose to Hulk. He didn't even give Hulk that much of a fight compared to Strange. So yeah please tell me how Sentry wins this?
By the way that wasn't the strongest Hulk. I think we've had this convo before. The strongest Hulk has celestial technology built into him and could lift and entire pyramind.
Did he even keep the planet together? I don't remember the scale being that big. Either way though Gladiator has destroyed planets with on three blows. Sentry hasn't even showed anything to destroying and island. Hulk just hasn't showed that yet. He is known for lifting 150 billion tons which he didn't even lift half of due to just the small portion and help from others. Besides that Gladiator has fought Tyrant and Ego the living planet. Sentry and Hulk combined couldn't do that.
Which ones? Which ones? I dont care which one of you answers me as long as one of you does. Care to post scans of this?
WW Hulk would beat the Gladiator senseless,but that wasnt the case with Sentry. Sentry took him head on and both of them burned themselves out. So,because Gladiator has destroyed a planet that means he wins this fight. So,I guess Terrax defeats Sentry as well based on that laughable logic. Nah,you see Sentry raped a planet destroyer with ease. So,try again because collateral damage doesnt make a convincing argument at all.