A good showing of dynamic would be his showing against Angrir. In the beginning his hits were doing nothing. He stepped it up and was able to hurt him. Trying to figure out who has more showings of dynamic strength between these two.
Gender: Unspecified Location: High School Massacre
Account Restricted
Going to have to disagree friend, Superman should be much less boring than he is, but he's ruined. He should be cool, last son of a dead race and all that but everytime they introduce more Kryptonians, that's ruined. Spiderman is not always corny, some story-lines have been terribly dark.
They both have dozens, if not hundreds, like this. Their whole schtick is to hit their opponents with half-powered attacks while trying to think or talk their way through a better solution. Then they amp it up after the initial loss and whup the hell out of their opponent once they're upset.
Gender: Unspecified Location: High School Massacre
Account Restricted
Going to have to disagree friend, in my opinion Peter goes up far more tiers proportionally when going all out than Clark. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise but...
Proportionally? Maybe, because it's easier to double or triple, say, 10 tons than the already-incalculable amount Superman starts at. But they both do this on the reg.
Gender: Unspecified Location: High School Massacre
Account Restricted
They do both do it regularly, and your point is valid that Superman starts almost peerless, but when Spiderman dials it up he does jump more levels than almost anyone else I can think of with the exception of perhaps Wolverine and Cap.
Hulk has dynamic strength. The madder he gets the stronger he gets. Do you get it now? Dynamic isn't a hard word to understand. Maybe I need to word it different for others. Out of these two, which one has displayed the abilities of "getting stronger due to circumstances" the most. It can be any kind of emotion. Stress, rage, hell, crying if that's what you want to use. The thread is SIMPLE.