sons of liberty was complete shit after the intro of playing as snake, I mean one of the enemies was a fat guy on rollerblades throwing dynamite. another was a vampire and a chik would coundlt be touched by bulelts. what the hell was this goofy shit? that may have been acceptable in a ifferent genre, but not in a spy espionage game, that has always been fantastical but stil kept the element of realism in the games.
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)
I agree with Satsujin and RR, MGS was infinitely better then MGS2. MGS2 was almost all cinema's. The gameplay was repetitive and lame, just didn't capture the brilliance that MGS did.
yeah actually i diddnt. that character actually had depth, and was very well thought out. as were all other characters in MGS 1. I dont have a problem with suspending reality, it is when you completely throw it out the window,that im getting out of the car. Telepathy actually has some validity in the world of science,saying it was a military experiment is cool. Vampires and chiks that cant be touched by bullets? that sounds like a bad mythology lesson to me.
I put up with the shitty characters and story telling of that game, up to the point where i fought a fat guy on rolelrblades throwing dynamite at me. I played for five more minutes and quit. I was thinking maybe this would have turned out to be a VR mission or sothin, but when i realized that no,that is just hopefull htinking is when i quit.
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)
Yes we do. My opinion i thouht the game play in the second one was was better becaus eof the first ,person mode. easier to kill when there are alot of enimes near by.
__________________ Samurai Girl={Master Sig Artist}
KMC Community Forums
Omfg......
Sep 9th, 2004 06:34 PM
MGS was better
Samurai Girl={Master Sig Artist}
