What's more canon, Labrinth of Evil or the Clone Wars Microseries?
Well, the Microseries was on tv and directly lead in to ROTS. Labrinth of Evil also directly lead into ROTS, and the author, James Luceno, got to read a copy of the ROTS script before writing the book.
Personally, I say LOE is more canon. But they both lead into ROTS but have different events happening at the same time. So I'd like to other opinions.
Probably LoE, but I like the ending of the Clone Wars microseries. I haven't read LoE yet, but from what a friend told me Obi-Wan and Anakin are on two completely different planets. How can that work? How can they both come out of Hyperspace and into the battle at the same time, if they are in two completely differebt star systems?
Hmmm.... interesting question, Lucas didn't write either of them, so they aren't G-canon. Both are approved by Lucas and aren't considered infinities so they aren't N-canon or S-Canon. I guess both would be considered C-canon. But since they contradict each other in some areas one has to be more "official" than the other. With the film the most recent version is said to take precedent. The book was released more recently right?
I would say LOE, but it didn't show the Force Crush done to Grievous wasn't shown (told) in LOE, but was shown in the micro series, I believe that LOE is more canon and that it just left out a few small details.
Actually, that's more or less confirmed by both Labyrinth of Evil and the SW Databank.
Labyrinth of Evil:
''. . . rumored to have single-handedly destroyed a seismic tank on Dantooine. . .''
Databank:
"Mace's troops were decimated by the terrible power of a seismic tank, and even though he was temporarily disarmed in the confusion of the battlefield, Mace was able to single-handedly defeat the droid forces and destroy the tank."
I vote for Labrinyth of Evil. More logical and factual. And let's be honest, does Mace Windu look like superman?! HEll no. He's suppose to be the best swordsman after Yoda and Dooku.
Mar 17th, 2006 02:44 AM
