Gender: Female Location: Washington, DC, United States
I saw the trailer for this in front of POTC, and I have to say, I thought it was really pretty funny. And the dog is adorable!
I think this will be better than Garfield because it obviously has a sense of humor and fun - I like that a lot about it, that it isn't taking itself too seriously but still looks like it will have a lot going for it. Jason Lee will probably be a really funny voice, too.
But I couldn't help but laugh when the dog sneezes and Patrick Warburton (with bleached hair) is standing there and goes, "Ugh, he didn't even close his mouth!"
I for one don't go see a moive if it sucks.It is not our fault.It is hollywoods.They now and then come out with a great movie.But latly they been going down pretty fast.JM
Gender: Female Location: Washington, DC, United States
I think that we need to keep in mind also that this is a kids movie, and therefore it's primarily aimed at families with children. I wouldn't get too worked up about it. It's just a movie that's supposed to be fun. I think it looks cute and I liked the cartoon, so I'll probably check it out.
It really is not anyones fault that hollywood is not producing movies that appeal to you. Hollywood is a business, someone is watching these movies, which is why hollywood keeps making them. Car companies dont stop producing cars that people consistanly buy.
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)
Exactly. The Scooby Doo movies were big. Roger Ebert gave good reviews to the Garfield movies. Hollywood sees a demand for live action movies based on old cartoon shows.
Then again, shouldn't they have made Underdog a CGI character like the others?
KMC Community Forums
May 21st, 2007 02:03 AM
