Wolverine vs Gladiator is pure spite, since Kallark is a Superman analogue. Wolverine being able to stab him in the shoulder during Annihilators is as PIS as when he stabbed Thanos during The Infinity Gauntlet. While never being able to penetrate the hide of Colossus, back in the day...
__________________
"I'm not smart so much as I am not dumb." - Harlan Ellison
He hit Colossus just once. That doesn't mean he should've cut him in half or anything. And it did pierce Piotr's skin, anyway.
Wolverine knows Strontian pressure points and was able to take a beating from Kallark's son and one-shot him without using his claws. Going all out, he could take out Gladiator himself.
Of course if Glads is using all of his powers, he wins this convincingly.
That's true. But the Hulk's hide was described as indestructible back then.
Off-panel. And he wasn't alone. But yes, I acknowledge that Glads will beat Logan for the majority. Doesn't mean he's impervious to his claws or anything, though.
Logan being able to penatrate hearald class types and greater like thanos and so on is just plain shit writing. Its like batman kicking darksied and causing him harm. bats and wolverine are so popular that when they or their team members battle god like beings or high hearlds what are the writers going to do? make wolverine or bats get swatted away? they cant do that they are to popular therfore they get away with some shitty feats that are completely unreasonable even for comic book standards.
Gladiator 10/10. Kallark as fast if not faster than Quicksilver. The same Quicksilver that destroyed Mr X. And even if some how one can argue Wolverine would have fared better, that's complete different when you're talking about Gladiator who is far above Pietro in strength plus has like 10 abilities more.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 22nd, 2012 08:55 PM
